From: Brian Ellis (bellis@tampabay.rr.com)
Date: 04/05/00-10:20:09 PM Z
The developer used with Azo seems to have a major effect on its speed. When
I exposed it under a 250 watt bulb in a reflector housing, at about 2 1/2
feet above the paper, I couldn't get a print no matter how short the
exposure. Even at 3 seconds, the paper turned completely black. This was
with Ilford Universal paper developer, diluted 1-9 (the normal dilution). I
then switched to my enlarger, which has an Aristo 4500 VCL head, at 4.0
contrast (a lot of blue light), without a lens and with the head about 2 1/2
feet from the paper, and it worked fine with exposures in the 30 second
range. A friend uses Amidol and with a 250 watt bulb set up similar to the
one I tried, has to use exposures in the minute range.
----- Original Message -----
From: janet neuhauser <jneuhauser@silverlink.net>
To: <cweese@earthlink.net>
Cc: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:27 PM
Subject: Re: Kodak Azo Paper Question
> Carl Weese wrote:
> >
> >
> > Pure silver-chloride papers are first of all too slow for enlarging--I
> > understand typical exposures under a bare 200-300 watt light bulb are in
> > the 10 to 30 second range. Enlarging exposures would take more or less
> > forever.
>
> I have the opportunity to purchase an old air force 8 x 10 contact printer
that still seems to work.
> Weren't those printers designed for silver chloride printing out papers?
I believe all the toggle
> switches on the front which dim the lights are for dodging. Does any one
know if this is correct.?
> Are bulbs still available? What kind of exposure times might one get on
this type of printer. There is
> a lot of 5 x 7 Azo (15 years old there as well. Can I assume it will
still be good? Thanks for any
> answers to these questions.
>
> Janet Neuhauser
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06/13/00-03:09:46 PM Z CST