Re: Kodak Azo Paper Question

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Steve Shapiro (sgshiya@redshift.com)
Date: 04/08/00-10:57:30 PM Z


We had these at Ft. MacGoo, where the lab (now dissasembled) was run by
James Adrich jaldrich@erols.com who can dial you in on this.

Is this a piece of thing you are intending to buy or that you already own?

This contact printer is one of the best you can find and most versitle. If
you are hesitating, let me know and I'll buy it.

Steve Shapiro
sgshiya@redshift.com
----- Original Message -----
From: janet neuhauser <jneuhauser@silverlink.net>
To: <cweese@earthlink.net>
Cc: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 6:27 PM
Subject: Re: Kodak Azo Paper Question

> Carl Weese wrote:
> >
> >
> > Pure silver-chloride papers are first of all too slow for enlarging--I
> > understand typical exposures under a bare 200-300 watt light bulb are in
> > the 10 to 30 second range. Enlarging exposures would take more or less
> > forever.
>
> I have the opportunity to purchase an old air force 8 x 10 contact printer
that still seems to work.
> Weren't those printers designed for silver chloride printing out papers?
I believe all the toggle
> switches on the front which dim the lights are for dodging. Does any one
know if this is correct.?
> Are bulbs still available? What kind of exposure times might one get on
this type of printer. There is
> a lot of 5 x 7 Azo (15 years old there as well. Can I assume it will
still be good? Thanks for any
> answers to these questions.
>
> Janet Neuhauser
>


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 06/13/00-03:09:47 PM Z CST