Re: cynotype negative

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Robert W. Schramm (schrammrus@hotmail.com)
Date: 12/25/00-12:06:07 PM Z


Jean,

No. It is the light used to expose the cyanotype print you need to be concerned with not the light used to make the negative. In fact, all a blue filter on the camera would do would be to alter the way in which various colors are converted to a range of greys.

For cyanotype you want a fairly high-contrast, fairly dense negative i.e. one which would print well on silver-gel paper with a 0 contrast filter.

You might try useing two parts A to one part B. This will not be faster but will give you a greater tonal range.

 

Bob Schramm

>From: Jean Burdett
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l
>Subject: cynotype negative
>Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2000 19:00:13 +1030
>
>Would the problem with cynotype negatives as far as the blue wavelength goes be helped by using some kind of filter on a box camera? I understood that the new cynotype formula is quicker than the old one, so I presume that would be relevant to the exposure time required.
> Birdie


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 01/03/01-03:59:42 PM Z CST