>> Vandykes _are_ kallitypes.
>> Kallitype = (sensitizing with ferric iron + image forming with silver)
>
>Because there are significant differences in the process, there's at least
>a strong case for separate categories -- as was argued on this list a few
>years a go.
>
>The final image may have the same components (or not, do we know for
>sure?) but given the differences in process, control, ingredients, color,
>etc. to my mind would do a disservice to both media to lump as one.
Guenther Hugendubel once proposed to no longer call a rose a rose if its a
white rose but -- with due repect -- I propose to continue saying that a
vandyke is a kallitype is a kallitype.
Andre
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Feb 01 2000 - 17:07:37