Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
• From: Craig Koshyk <chiendog@pangea.ca>
• Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:30:38 -0500
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

At the risk of sounding like the digi-photo newbe I am, may I ask the 
experts out there what the pros and cons are for using a film recorder to
make an interpositive in an effort to make an enlarged neg?

I was thinking about scanning a small neg,tweeking it in photoshop, then
having a 2x3inch or 4x5 inch interpostive made. I would then use this
interpositive to make a larger (11x14 on HP5) neg by projection in my
darkroom.


CK

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
    • From: terry roth <terryroth@earthlink.net>
  • Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
    • From: Sam Wang <stwang@mindspring.com>
  • Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
    • From: Rod Fleming <rodfleming@sol.co.uk>
  • Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
    • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>

• Prev by Date: Re: curves for gum printing
• Next by Date: Re: Color analyzer vs densitometer
• Prev by thread: Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
• Next by thread: Re: Digital Pt/Pd tones continued
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread