From: Bill Collins (photo@intrex.net)
Date: 06/06/00-05:43:01 AM Z
While I agree that the autoresponder isn't a big deal, it should be trivial to deal with. Someone could send an unsubscribe command with a forged header, so that it appears to come from the guy who has the autoresponder set up. I'd be glad to do it, but not without the ok from one of the list minders.
Bill
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Editor - P.O.V. Image Service" <editor@p-o-v-image.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 03:38:01 -0400
>Thor Bols wrote:
>
>>
>> And, really! The suggestion that nobody post this weekend! Because doing
>> so will only provoke the autoresponder. Gosh, do you people pay your ISP by
>> the byte? Ever hear of the delete key?
>>
>
>Got to agree with Thor on this one...
>
>(And please, don't anyone have a heart attack because of this rare commonality
>of viewpoint here..)
>
>It's a short message, and it's easy enough to just delete every re: message that
>comes in from Naim's account to my box..
>
>In fact, if it keeps up long enough, I'll just have my e-mail program move every
>one of them that comes in directly to my trash folder... Belay that, I am
>setting up that filter as soon as I fire off this e-mail..
>
>The few options we had for dealing with it are done...
>
>So, now, it has to just be the loud "ticking clock" of the list... It'll just be
>background noise...
>
>Keith
>
>
>--
>{ The views expressed in the preceding are those of the }
>{ author, alone, and are neither the responsibility of, }
>{ nor, should they be understood to represent the }
>{ official viewpoint of P.O.V. Image Service. }
> (Persistence of Vision Image Service)
> "Your link to outstanding imagery."
> http://www.p-o-v-image.com/
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : 07/14/00-09:46:44 AM Z CST