[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Epson or HP for alt-phot ... ? (some OT)
My exact thoughts, I took it as an opinion the first I
read it too. Seems someone doesn't like hearing
negative things about HP. I am happy with my Epson,
HPs are also good.
> Jeffrey,
>
> Maybe in your haste to respond, you missed the words
> "perhaps" and
> "probably" in the post by Mitch. Had you seen
> these, I'm sure you would
> have realized that this WAS an opinion and not a
> citable point of fact.
>
> You get up in the wrong side of the bed today?
>
>
> Mitch Valburg wrote:
> >...
> >On the other hand, the print head in a cartridge
> that you purchase for $30
> >and
> >costs perhaps $3-5 to manufacture is probably built
> to a much lower
> >standard of
> >tolerances than one which must last through the
> entire warranty period,
> >especially when you factor in the more
> self-destructive nature of heat
> >driven
> >(HP) technology as compared to piezoelectric
> technology (Epson).
> >...
>
> Do you have some proof or evidence to back up such
> claims or is this
> just conjecture (as I suspect)?
> Perhaps one is best informed if they collect
> information on the printers
> and the technologies themselves from reliable
> sources.
>
> As a favor to us all, such claims should cite a
> source of reference. If
> not, it can be assumed to be personal opinion.
>
>
______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at
> http://www.hotmail.com
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com