From: Michael Goldbard (m@gbard.com)
Date: 11/03/00-10:40:12 AM Z
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Mutmansky" <psu4ever@ix.netcom.com>
>To: "alternative process newslist" <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
>Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:33 AM
>Subject: Re: Pack for 7x17 camera.
>
>
>> Thanks for all the input on the packs everyone.
>>
>> I have resubscribed to the newsgroup after being away for over a month
>> of travel, and I'm not getting the posts mailed to me properly, so I am
>> not able to respond to any of the individual posts directly. I have
>> tried re-resubscribing, and hopefully I'll be in the loop for the
>> future.
>>
>> It is comforting to hear that there are panel loading packs out there
>> that are large enough, although I didn't see any that looked big enough
>> the last time I was at REI or LL Bean. I'll continue my search with the
>> knowledge that there will be success!
>>
>> ---Michael
>>
>>
>Please tell us of your final choice.
>
>I called TENBA in Brooklyn, NY and found out about their P265 for my 8X10.
>At $500, list it's gonna remain on a back burner, for me.
>
>S. Shapiro
Steve,
Perhaps the P265 might be less painful from B&H at $255.95. Another
alternative is the F.64 BPX on special at $209.95, also from B&H,
which is designed for 8x10 field cameras. I just bought one of
those, just arrived, for my 8x10 Masterview. I discovered that brand
from postings to the rec.photo.equipment.large-format newsgroup.
I don't work for B&H; I just don't like to spend double for
equipment. I hope that this helps.
Michael
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/01/00-11:46:54 AM Z CST