From: Pam Niedermayer (pam_pine@cape.com)
Date: 11/03/00-11:59:53 AM Z
I already measured the BPX for whoever started this thread. It's not tall enough
for 7x17, but is nigh on to perfect for 8x10.
Pam
Michael Goldbard wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Michael Mutmansky" <psu4ever@ix.netcom.com>
> >To: "alternative process newslist" <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
> >Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 8:33 AM
> >Subject: Re: Pack for 7x17 camera.
> >
> >
> >> Thanks for all the input on the packs everyone.
> >>
> >> I have resubscribed to the newsgroup after being away for over a month
> >> of travel, and I'm not getting the posts mailed to me properly, so I am
> >> not able to respond to any of the individual posts directly. I have
> >> tried re-resubscribing, and hopefully I'll be in the loop for the
> >> future.
> >>
> >> It is comforting to hear that there are panel loading packs out there
> >> that are large enough, although I didn't see any that looked big enough
> >> the last time I was at REI or LL Bean. I'll continue my search with the
> >> knowledge that there will be success!
> >>
> >> ---Michael
> >>
> >>
> >Please tell us of your final choice.
> >
> >I called TENBA in Brooklyn, NY and found out about their P265 for my 8X10.
> >At $500, list it's gonna remain on a back burner, for me.
> >
> >S. Shapiro
>
> Steve,
>
> Perhaps the P265 might be less painful from B&H at $255.95. Another
> alternative is the F.64 BPX on special at $209.95, also from B&H,
> which is designed for 8x10 field cameras. I just bought one of
> those, just arrived, for my 8x10 Masterview. I discovered that brand
> from postings to the rec.photo.equipment.large-format newsgroup.
>
> I don't work for B&H; I just don't like to spend double for
> equipment. I hope that this helps.
>
> Michael
-- Pamela G. Niedermayer Pinehill Softworks Inc. 600 W. 28th St., Suite 103 Austin, TX 78705 512-236-1677 512-236-8143 fax http://www.pinehill.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 12/01/00-11:46:54 AM Z CST