[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bubbles in gelatin/keith/thor

It depends to a great extent on the way the original poster, to whom you are
replying, has set up his/her email. Apparently the newsgroups have problems with
reply-to addresses that are aliases.

Pam

Jenfieldny@aol.com wrote:
> 
> I am going to comment on a few things here.  first of all, i sent comments to
> the list about my statement wtiht he nastiness thing, and they seemed to have
> gotten lost in the mail. i guess in a simialr way, without me noticing, that
> happened with the other people.  i have now hit "reply all" so i wil see what
> happens. however, it is not consistnat becuase my gelatin comments went
> through just fine.
> gelatin first:
> 
> In a message dated 10/11/00 5:37:16 PM, dsbryant@worldnet.att.net writes:
> 
> << > In a message dated 10/11/00 1:45:43 AM, msandquist@joshuanet.com writes:
> 
> >
> 
> > << There are also commercial products known as defoaming agents in the
> 
> >
> 
> > most generic sense. >>
> 
> >
> 
> > Yes, there is something called LFN Defoamer that I used to use in
> 
> developer
> 
> > to stop pinholes with infrared film.  I think it is still avaiable in
> 
> camera
> 
> > stores.  I think the stuff was original used to cut air bubbles in
> 
> processing
> 
> > machines, but do not quote me on this.
> 
> Did this work successfully with your IR development?
> 
> Don Bryant
> 
> yes, it did work.  jsut put a few drops in the gallon of stock developer.
> however, i have gotten really good at carefully agitating and i think that
> helps just as well. don, if you want to know how i do it, write to me off
> list and i will send you instructions on what i do.  i have taught this in
> workshops and it seems to work well.
> 
> now, to comment again on the thor/keith thing:    this is what i had written
> and as i look back to cut and pasate now, it did go to keith instead of the
> list!
> i think the main issue is that these images do not fit at this site, which is
> alternative processes. try some of the "glamour" sites that may understand
> this work. personally, i never did understand this kind of imagery and it
> always amazes me that you can find women that will do it. however, i am an
> infrared photographer and what i usually like about the film is that it can
> be used in a subtle way, so that it may look a little softer and ethereal,
> but it does not hit you in the face.  i do not understand why you are using
> it.  it does not add to the images, in fact the harsh shadows take away from
> the figures.
> so, that is a short cirtique without being nasty. however, if keith and thor
> are the same person, that is really sick.
> please do not respond to this - opinions do not need to be answered and i
> will not continue with this discussion.
> jill

-- 
Pamela G. Niedermayer
Pinehill Softworks Inc.
600 W. 28th St., Suite 103
Austin, TX 78705
512-236-1677
512-236-8143 fax
http://www.pinehill.com