Re: dual ID's

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: dual ID's
• From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 09:47:05 -0700
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• References: <f7.3812838.2717187f@aol.com><000701c03460$fdec4b00$3f1fd1d1@nickspc><003801c0346a$ce2b5d20$25dc4a3f@mcn.net>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <tracez@mcn.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 9:38 AM
Subject: Re: dual ID's


> but to prove it one
> way or another would be a task only fitting for the FBI or internet
security
> types

Not true, it is a very simple matter to track down an email address,
although I have no desire to do so since it involves a some time, of which I
have precious little.  Everyone who has entertained the thought of a dual ID
should understand that you can't fool everyone all the time.

Nick

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: dual ID's
    • From: Pam Niedermayer <pam_pine@cape.com>

• References:
  • Re: bubbles in gelatin/keith/thor
    • From: Jenfieldny@aol.com
  • dual ID's
    • From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
  • Re: dual ID's
    • From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <tracez@mcn.net>

• Prev by Date: Re: dual ID's
• Next by Date: How Much Silver Nitrate in Solution?
• Prev by thread: Re: dual ID's
• Next by thread: Re: dual ID's
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread