Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
• From: George Huczek <ghuczek@sk.sympatico.ca>
• Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001 19:16:05 -0600
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <be.123a6a8d.27f9693d@aol.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

At 01:33 AM 02/04/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>I have a Carl Zeiss 300mm Dagor that easily covers 14x17 (~same diagonal as 
>12x20) at infinity.  I also have a 240mm CZ Dagor that just hits the corners 
>on 14x17.
>
>Kerik Kouklis
>www.Kerik.com
>

A 19" Dagor will give more than enough coverage - up to 20x24 in fact when
stopped down. I don't know where Richard got his information that Dagors
will not cover 12x20, but it is not correct.  I can confirm Kerik's
comments about the 14" 7.7 Carl Zeiss Dagor as well - enough coverage for
14x17 for sure, with some movements.




 _
[o] -GH

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
    • From: Sandy King <sanking@hubcap.clemson.edu>
  • Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
    • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>

• References:
  • Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
    • From: Kerik717@aol.com

• Prev by Date: Re: chemistry question--Sil, et al?
• Next by Date: Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
• Prev by thread: Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
• Next by thread: Re: Wide lenses for 12x20 @ 300mm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread