Re: to squabble or not..

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: to squabble or not..
• From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
• Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2001 13:57:22 -0700
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• In-reply-to: <000e01c0c135$ed67bc80$5e56073e@mark>
• References: <F264j1HaKtKufVma0os00004e2c@hotmail.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

At 09:44 PM 04/09/2001 +0100, you wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Rosae Reeder" <erzolisae40@hotmail.com>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
>Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 7:49 PM
>Subject: to squabble or not..
>
  And etc., 
  I recieved this message with a quoted previous message but no new text.
Did others get this? I've gotten a couple of messages off the list like
this recently and would like to know if there is a problem with my
newsreader. 
----
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles,Ca.
dickburk@ix.netcom.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: to squabble or not..
    • From: Pam Niedermayer <pam_pine@cape.com>
  • Re: to squabble or not..
    • From: Mark <Markatcirce@btinternet.com>

• References:
  • to squabble or not..
    • From: Rosae Reeder <erzolisae40@hotmail.com>
  • Re: to squabble or not..
    • From: Mark <Markatcirce@btinternet.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: to squabble or not..
• Next by Date: Re: to squabble or not..
• Prev by thread: Re: to squabble or not..
• Next by thread: Re: to squabble or not..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread