Re: to squabble or not..

• To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
• Subject: Re: to squabble or not..
• From: Nick Makris <nick@mcn.org>
• Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 06:12:40 -0700
• Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
• References: <3.0.6.32.20010409172127.0081a2a0@popd.ix.netcom.com><3AD206EE.3C81@pacifier.com>
• Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca

From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
> I don't mind the warnings; what I mind is all the editorial comments and
> personal insults that come after.   

I concur, and I never saw anything controversial about the warnings.

From: "Art Chakalis" <achakali@gcfn.org>
> Could we please let this topic die a natural death . . . I can't believe
> anyone could provide any further information/knowledge to the group.
  
I also concur.

N

• References:
  • Re: to squabble or not..
    • From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
  • Re: to squabble or not..
    • From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

• Prev by Date: Re: to squabble or not..
• Next by Date: Re: to squabble or not..
• Prev by thread: Re: to squabble or not..
• Next by thread: Re: to squabble or not..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread