From: Burkhardt Kiegeland (bkiegeland@weisserlotus.co.at)
Date: 01/02/01-09:28:21 AM Z
Sorry, I pushed the button before signing this mail...
Burkhardt Kiegeland
Hope that this Epson stuff is not off topic in this list...
Printing from scanned large format negatives I definitely
see a difference especially in sharpness when printed at
240, 300 and 360dpi. There is even a slightly better
definition with 480. Printer is Color 3000, driven with
Piezography or Tritone software and inks. I trust my eyes
looking through a loupe more than other authorities.
I did quite a lot with inkjet during last year. But there is
many of my work left I strongly prefer to look at as a
PL/PT, Salted paper or Kallitype. Apparently there is more
sensual depths in the classic processes...
Jack Fulton wrote:
> This is not Piezography info but . . .
>
> We just had an Epson 7500 installed and to Epson reps were w/me. One, the
> western territory head and the other one his ace mechanics/installers. They
> both told me that for THAT machine 240 is the maximum info needed to print
> to the machine.
> For sure, I'd like to know why such a low res. We cannot see a difference so
> far in tests sending higher res files but our tests are not at all complete
> as of yet.
> Jack Fulton
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/05/01-11:45:20 AM Z CST