From: James Romeo (jamesromeo@mac.com)
Date: 01/19/01-10:49:52 AM Z
Thanks for the info.
I am very interested in the making digital paper neg.
A few ?
What would be a good paper to use.
Judy said Dan Burkholder wrote a book that covers this sub. Does eny one
know the name of the book?İhanks
James
> From: Richard Morris <Richard.Morris@brunel.ac.uk>
> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:19:34 +0000 (GMT)
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Cc: alt-pross <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Subject: Re: paper neg
>
> I have made some very good paper negs, using Epsons own matt paper, not the
> new heavyweight, and then made salt prints. The results have all the detail
> one could wish and look just like the originals. The befeits of doing it
> this way is that you can tweak image very quickly to make a bet
> On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:57:05 -0500 James Romeo <jamesromeo@mac.com> wrote:
>
>> Most of us at one time in our photo work we have made paper neg.
>> I was wondering if eny one out there has every worked with a enlarged neg
>> made digital?
>> It would be easy to make as it is paper and you should not have the problem
>> with the ink you have with a film base in your pinter.
>> All of digital,photoshop and my new imac are new to me. I wjust thought
>> about it today as I made some digital prints.
>> It might work for some alt-pross.
>> Cranes kid finish stationary makes a nice print and cheep. I would not work
>> for a neg as it has a water mark.
>> Let me knoe eny thoughts on the paper neg.
>> Take care
>> James
>>
>
> Richard Morris
> Brunel University, UK
> dtsrrlm@brunel.ac.uk
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/05/01-11:45:22 AM Z CST