From: Richard M. Papazian (rmp@fwi.com)
Date: 01/19/01-06:17:19 PM Z
The name of the book is Making Digital Negatives for Contact Printing It is
available from his website, www.danburkholder.com.
James Romeo wrote:
> Thanks for the info.
> I am very interested in the making digital paper neg.
> A few ?
> What would be a good paper to use.
> Judy said Dan Burkholder wrote a book that covers this sub. Does eny one
> know the name of the book?İhanks
> James
>
> > From: Richard Morris <Richard.Morris@brunel.ac.uk>
> > Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:19:34 +0000 (GMT)
> > To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Cc: alt-pross <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> > Subject: Re: paper neg
> >
> > I have made some very good paper negs, using Epsons own matt paper, not the
> > new heavyweight, and then made salt prints. The results have all the detail
> > one could wish and look just like the originals. The befeits of doing it
> > this way is that you can tweak image very quickly to make a bet
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:57:05 -0500 James Romeo <jamesromeo@mac.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Most of us at one time in our photo work we have made paper neg.
> >> I was wondering if eny one out there has every worked with a enlarged neg
> >> made digital?
> >> It would be easy to make as it is paper and you should not have the problem
> >> with the ink you have with a film base in your pinter.
> >> All of digital,photoshop and my new imac are new to me. I wjust thought
> >> about it today as I made some digital prints.
> >> It might work for some alt-pross.
> >> Cranes kid finish stationary makes a nice print and cheep. I would not work
> >> for a neg as it has a water mark.
> >> Let me knoe eny thoughts on the paper neg.
> >> Take care
> >> James
> >>
> >
> > Richard Morris
> > Brunel University, UK
> > dtsrrlm@brunel.ac.uk
> >
-- Richard M. Papazian rmp@fwi.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/05/01-11:45:22 AM Z CST