From: Katharine Thayer (kthayer@pacifier.com)
Date: 07/04/01-12:40:46 PM Z
Should work just fine. One of the many printers I've used to make
digital negatives for gum over the years was the Stylus Photo, the first
model in that series; the 700 was its replacement if I recall correctly.
Anyway, it worked just fine. If I can find the information about which
image I made with negatives from which printer, I'd be happy to send you
a couple scans of gum prints made with negatives from the photo stylus
and you can decide for yourself if you can live with the resolution.
kt
Gordon J. Holtslander wrote:
>
> I'm dying to do digital gum. Any opinions on using a humble Epson stylus
> photo 700 to print the negatives. I'd reconcile poor resolution just to
> get know how it works with what I have.
>
> I have some ideas about false coloring black and white pinhole images and
> printing them with gum.
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Gordon J. Holtslander Dept. of Biology
> holtsg@duke.usask.ca 112 Science Place
> http://duke.usask.ca/~holtsg University of Saskatchewan
> Tel (306) 966-4433 Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
> Fax (306) 966-4461 Canada S7N 5E2
> ---------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 08/02/01-11:56:46 AM Z CST