From: Callie Type (kallitype@hotmail.com)
Date: 06/22/01-08:58:37 PM Z
Probably, it has more to do with seniority than with style. Yes, there's a
little to much sarcasm in my tone, but the ral problem is that you haven't
gotten to know me, and so I'm considered "out of line". I only come out of
lurking when I get pissed off. Call it a personality problem, call it
insecurity, or just call it not having much to say.
My comments regarding Dick Sullivan stemmed from an entirely ridiculous,
immature, and senseless series of condenscending, wrong, and just plain mean
comments he made awhile back regarding a respected listmember's gold
process. His comments were far worse than my "sugar on shit", but where was
everbody? Dick is above reproach, right? C'mon Garimo, do you think Dick
was "respecting" list members when he went on his tirade? It doesn't
matter, I guess. This is getting stupid.
>From: garimo <omirag@cruzio.com>
>Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca, alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: Mean Spirited Posts
>Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
> >I for one am in favor of knowing about the person engaged in current
> >discussion, perhaps to the extent that if they don't identify themselves
> >they should not be allowed to post.
> >
> >Nick
>
>Hey Nick,
> For me, the name one identifies with isn't really the issue. I think
>what is in question is the quality of how they relate to others, It's
>the content of the post, not what name you call them. I hope you're not
>suggesting ugly behavior is more acceptable if it comes from a person
>with a typical two word name?
> I too noticed that it was the quality of content in the posts of
>"callie" that caused identity questions being raised before. But does
>knowing that another name callie uses is Deborah change her "sugar on
>shit" style of writing? It doesn't for me.
>
>If the issue is one of treating others with respect, then the list
>doesn't need more rules. the weekly reminders state-
>
> >There are four basic rules for using this list. Treat everyone with
> >respect. Don't send unsubscribe requests to the list, don't send
> >messages with attachments, and don't send viruses through the list
>
>My feeling is (regardless of the name in use) the quality of callie's
>posts are and have been without basic respect for those she writes to.
>Thinking someone may have a large ego (even if it's Dicks!!) does not
>exempt one from the first basic basic rule when writing to this list.
>(but then many ignore the second rule as well...) What to do? enforce
>'em or move on?... The people who send unsubscribe requests to the
>list, are unsubscribed.
>
>okay...so much for my analysis...
>garimo
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:41:55 AM Z CST