From: Dave Rose (photo@wir.net)
Date: 06/27/01-12:29:49 PM Z
I guess I'm in luck. Living in NW Wyoming, there are virtually no
"environmental pollutants". Our biggest "urban center" is Cheyenne, with a
population of 53,011. :-)
I would be interested in reading about the "began to fade in 90 days"
problem, Bob. Can you cite printed or WWW references?
FWIW, I plan to do a 'torture test' on an Epson 2000P print - hang it in the
greenhouse above the cactus, exposed to full sun. We'll see how good it
really is! :-)
Best regards from Big Wonderful Wyoming,
Dave Rose
Cactus Cowboy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Kiss" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: inkjet prints
> DEAR DAVE,
> I believe that their claim was disproved when the colors began to fade
> in 90 days due to environmental pollutants in most urban centers. I think
> this is the system they introduced late last year and everyone (like
myself)
> who was hoping for an archival digital output system was greatly
> disappointed.
> CHEERS!
> BOB KISS
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dave Rose
>
> > I just took delivery on an Epson 2000P. Epson claims that prints on
> > Archival Matte Paper are good for "200+" years. If this is even halfway
> > true, I think "questions of archivality" have indeed been solved.
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:41:55 AM Z CST