From: Bob Kiss (bobkiss@caribsurf.com)
Date: 06/27/01-12:59:58 PM Z
DEAR DAVE,
I think Larry Rohr answered it in his posting.
CHEERS!
BOB
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Rose <photo@wir.net>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: inkjet prints
> I guess I'm in luck. Living in NW Wyoming, there are virtually no
> "environmental pollutants". Our biggest "urban center" is Cheyenne, with
a
> population of 53,011. :-)
>
> I would be interested in reading about the "began to fade in 90 days"
> problem, Bob. Can you cite printed or WWW references?
>
> FWIW, I plan to do a 'torture test' on an Epson 2000P print - hang it in
the
> greenhouse above the cactus, exposed to full sun. We'll see how good it
> really is! :-)
>
> Best regards from Big Wonderful Wyoming,
> Dave Rose
> Cactus Cowboy
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Kiss" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 7:19 AM
> Subject: Re: inkjet prints
>
>
> > DEAR DAVE,
> > I believe that their claim was disproved when the colors began to
fade
> > in 90 days due to environmental pollutants in most urban centers. I
think
> > this is the system they introduced late last year and everyone (like
> myself)
> > who was hoping for an archival digital output system was greatly
> > disappointed.
> > CHEERS!
> > BOB KISS
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Dave Rose
> >
> > > I just took delivery on an Epson 2000P. Epson claims that prints on
> > > Archival Matte Paper are good for "200+" years. If this is even
halfway
> > > true, I think "questions of archivality" have indeed been solved.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 07/12/01-11:41:55 AM Z CST