gum flat and lacking contrast

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Sandy King (sanking@clemson.edu)
Date: 10/14/01-04:57:33 PM Z

Juan Riera wrote:

>
>I have read that Stephen Livick does not like BL tubes very much, as he says
>results are flat and lacking contrast on dichromate gum. What do you think
>about?

Gee Juan, I thought gum was supposed to look like that!!

Sandy King

>
>Regards,
>Juan
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Sandy King" <sanking@clemson.edu>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
>Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 6:16 PM
>Subject: UV printing systems
>
>
>>
>> I am preparing an article on UV printing sources for an on-line
>> photography magazine. The article will briefly compare the UV
>> printing systems in common use and present construction information
>> and printing comparisons of metal halide and several kinds of
>> fluorescent lights. The comparison test will be done with carbon
>> printing (a dichromated colloid system) and Vandyke (an iron silver
>> process).
>>
>> If anyone has on hand results from actual comparison testing, with
>> any process, of different printing sources, say BL to BLB, or BL to
>> Super Actinic or Aqua I would be very appreciative if you would share
>> that information with me and/or the list.
>>
>> Sandy King
>>
>>
>>
>> 

--

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/02/01-08:55:27 AM Z CST