From: Baird, Darryl (dbaird@umflint.edu)
Date: 10/28/01-03:51:28 PM Z
Well Ken, I must say that I'm sitting here rather slack-jawed at this
idea. What a wonderful idea! I mean, just forget the Polaroid "magic"
developer and roll your own.
Can't wait to try this, Polaroid 55 in Rollo Pyro. Oh boy.
-Darryl
> ----------
> From: Ken Sinclair
> Reply To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:31 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Polaroid for POP
>
> George
>
> I have a friend who removes the material from his holder
> unprocessed,
> strips it apart at home and tray processes in his favourite film
> developer.
>
> I have been told and (have read recently) that the film is actually
> Kodak's
> Pan-X. The results I have seen, seem to "agree" that by treating
> this film
> as if it were Pan-X you should be able to increase the contrast by
> following suit and tray processing.
>
> > Can anyone tell me if Polaroid Type 55 is capable of producing a
> >negative with the correct density range for Printing Out Paper ?
>
> Ken
>
> [||/\/\/\/\//\/|| Ken Sinclair RBP, FBPA.
> [|| ||-| Applied Photographic
> Services
> [|| || | Lethbridge,
> [|| || | Alberta, Canada,
> [|| ||-| (403) 381-1654.
> [||\/\/\/\//\/\|| photo1@telusplanet.net
> _0___________0______
> |___________________ |
> O
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/02/01-08:55:27 AM Z CST