From: Tox Gunn (tox@remarque.org)
Date: 10/29/01-12:10:46 PM Z
Should Polaroid actually close lines because of business issues,
this might also be useful data for folks to start trying to
reproduce bits for ongoing use of the polaroid backs.
Tox
> Well Ken, I must say that I'm sitting here rather slack-jawed at this
> idea. What a wonderful idea! I mean, just forget the Polaroid "magic"
> developer and roll your own.
>
> Can't wait to try this, Polaroid 55 in Rollo Pyro. Oh boy.
>
> -Darryl
>
> > ----------
> > From: Ken Sinclair
> > Reply To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 10:31 AM
> > To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> > Subject: Re: Polaroid for POP
> >
> > George
> >
> > I have a friend who removes the material from his holder
> > unprocessed,
> > strips it apart at home and tray processes in his favourite film
> > developer.
> >
> > I have been told and (have read recently) that the film is actually
> > Kodak's
> > Pan-X. The results I have seen, seem to "agree" that by treating
> > this film
> > as if it were Pan-X you should be able to increase the contrast by
> > following suit and tray processing.
> >
> > > Can anyone tell me if Polaroid Type 55 is capable of producing a
> > >negative with the correct density range for Printing Out Paper ?
> >
> Ken
> >
> > [||/\/\/\/\//\/|| Ken Sinclair RBP, FBPA.
> > [|| ||-| Applied Photographic
> > Services
> > [|| || | Lethbridge,
> > [|| || | Alberta, Canada,
> > [|| ||-| (403) 381-1654.
> > [||\/\/\/\//\/\|| photo1@telusplanet.net
> > _0___________0______
> > |___________________ |
> > O
> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 11/02/01-08:55:27 AM Z CST