Re: HISTORY Re: Anderson again two

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: pete (temperaprint@blueyonder.co.uk)
Date: 02/06/02-06:07:10 AM Z


on 6/2/02 4:30 am, Judy Seigel at jseigel@panix.com wrote:

>
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, pete wrote:
>
>> It is obvious that we are not going to agree on
>> this issue, so ... let history decide!
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Actually, I think we ARE going to agree... While folks have been talking
> Magic Brush (and I have GOT to have one of those), I've found some very
> interesting things, which I am going to share... However, and meanwhile,
> please note:
>
> "HISTORY IS MORE OR LESS BUNK..."
>
> That's one of the more famous sayings of that great American Gum Printer,
> Henry Ford.
>
> Or let's put it this way, HISTORY has had 72 years on this issue, and
> messed it up royally. In fact HISTORY isn't to be trusted out of your
> sight for 15 minutes (just ask any historian).
>
> best,
>
> Judy
>
Hi Judy,

Fine let's share that is what this list is supposed to be about. hopefully
it does not follow the other saying :

'History is written by the victor's'

best

Pete


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/08/02-09:45:21 AM Z CST