Alt-photo-process-l February 2002
By Thread

Date view Subject view Author view
499 Messages
Starting:01/31/02-08:06:06 PM Z Ending:03/01/02-04:54:40 PM Z

SubjectAuthor Date
Silk ScreenBill Collins02/28/02-09:42:54 AM Z
Fw: Silk ScreenKris Erickson02/28/02-10:18:19 AM Z
Duplicating filmBreukel, C (HKG)02/27/02-07:46:29 AM Z
Re: Duplicating filmJudy Seigel02/27/02-01:37:01 PM Z
Re: Duplicating filmFotoDave@aol.com02/27/02-04:06:38 PM Z
--> Re: Duplicating filmBreukel, C (HKG)02/28/02-01:57:04 AM Z
--> Was: Duplicating film, a Ps..Breukel, C (HKG)02/28/02-05:45:19 AM Z
Re: Duplicating filmFotoDave@aol.com02/28/02-07:12:54 AM Z
Photo Trash MovementGrafist@aol.com02/26/02-08:30:05 PM Z
ferric citrateSandy King02/26/02-09:27:58 PM Z
--> Re: ferric citrateMatthew Hoffman02/27/02-07:49:01 AM Z
--> Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplySandy King02/28/02-08:47:34 AM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink Supplygarimo02/28/02-11:48:20 AM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplyJim Murphy02/28/02-01:06:46 PM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplyEnder100@aol.com02/28/02-03:34:51 PM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplySandy King02/28/02-04:24:35 PM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplyGregory W. Blank02/28/02-08:51:22 PM Z
--> Re: Epson 2000P Continuous Ink SupplyJason Mandella02/28/02-03:56:09 PM Z
"Good" WagnerRobkin, Eugene02/26/02-03:50:46 PM Z
Digital NegativesCarl Sander Socolow02/26/02-02:43:33 PM Z
RE: Digital NegativesJohn Campbell02/26/02-03:30:18 PM Z
Fw: Digital NegativesAdrian Joyner02/26/02-06:40:28 PM Z
Re: "Good" WagnerAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/26/02-04:38:50 PM Z
Re: 'Good' WagnerStimpy02/26/02-11:07:29 PM Z
Re: "Good" WagnerAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/27/02-03:04:46 PM Z
Professional Copy 4125William Marsh02/26/02-12:41:27 AM Z
RE: What is "Good Photography"? - Duchamp in Cheney CountryThor Bols02/25/02-07:08:18 PM Z
Re: Formula for premortem artistic...William Marsh02/25/02-02:37:51 PM Z
RE: Formula for premortem artistic...John Campbell02/25/02-04:39:54 PM Z
unsubscribeNicodub13@aol.com02/25/02-05:23:30 PM Z
magic brushWilliam Marsh02/24/02-02:50:25 PM Z
RE: magic brushKerik Kouklis02/26/02-12:41:29 AM Z
The Temperaprint Fellowshippete02/24/02-11:57:15 AM Z
Re: The Temperaprint FellowshipPeter Marshall02/25/02-05:41:21 AM Z
--> Re: The Temperaprint FellowshipPeter Marshall02/25/02-09:46:21 AM Z
Re: The Temperaprint FellowshipGrafist@aol.com02/25/02-05:50:41 AM Z
--> Re: The Temperaprint Fellowshippete02/25/02-06:05:20 AM Z
Re: The Temperaprint Fellowshipterry lindquist02/25/02-10:36:26 AM Z
Niépce -- splitting hairsGumprint@aol.com02/23/02-05:12:05 PM Z
Re: Niépce -- splitting hairsPeter Marshall02/24/02-05:15:21 AM Z
I'll be back ...Linas Kudzma02/22/02-10:48:57 PM Z
PFJ Delivery was Re: on the contrary....Re: VDB formulasCCBaggett@aol.com02/22/02-05:12:17 PM Z
Re: making caseinJudy Seigel02/21/02-09:25:03 PM Z
Re: new balancesFDanB@aol.com02/21/02-06:51:19 PM Z
Focus on imaging-Birmingham, UKjulian smart02/21/02-04:51:30 PM Z
Re: Focus on imaging-Birmingham, UKCactus Cowboy02/21/02-10:23:13 PM Z
--> Re: Focus on imaging-Birmingham, UKjulian smart02/23/02-04:30:39 PM Z
High and Dryjeffbuck@swcp.com02/21/02-11:46:53 AM Z
Re: High and DryCarl Weese02/21/02-12:33:00 PM Z
Re: High and DryJeffrey D. Mathias02/25/02-06:32:15 AM Z
intensification of pyrocat negativeIstvan Bibo02/20/02-04:39:42 AM Z
Re : Apologies and autochromeJean-Paul Gandolfo02/20/02-03:14:58 AM Z
Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilitySmieglitz@aol.com02/19/02-09:48:55 PM Z
Toning with Glossy PaperTrickstrr@aol.com02/19/02-08:31:33 PM Z
Re: Toning with Glossy PaperRobert W. Schramm02/19/02-08:48:03 PM Z
sabatierChristina Z. Anderson02/19/02-04:56:37 PM Z
Paper Questiondina Fraioli02/18/02-11:39:10 PM Z
Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushJeff Buckels02/18/02-04:02:05 PM Z
RE: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushLinas Kudzma02/18/02-06:10:49 PM Z
Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushKerik Kouklis02/18/02-04:45:42 PM Z
--> SPOTTING NEGSBob Kiss02/18/02-08:29:40 PM Z
--> Re: SPOTTING NEGSEd Buffaloe02/19/02-04:58:50 AM Z
--> Re: SPOTTING NEGSChristine02/20/02-10:17:06 AM Z
Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushCactus Cowboy02/18/02-09:35:39 PM Z
Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushJudy Seigel02/19/02-01:38:53 AM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushSteve Shapiro02/19/02-02:37:37 AM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushJudy Seigel02/19/02-02:45:20 AM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushSteve Shapiro02/19/02-07:41:35 PM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushRichard M. Koolish02/19/02-08:04:52 AM Z
RE: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the Brushhisun.wong@citicorp.com02/19/02-01:56:34 AM Z
--> Frankly, my dear, I don't give a dram! (Was: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the Brush)John Campbell02/19/02-02:32:14 AM Z
--> Re: Frankly, my dear, I don't give a dram! (Was: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the Brush)Judy Seigel02/19/02-02:42:52 AM Z
Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushRuth Formanek02/19/02-10:15:16 AM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/19/02-12:50:49 PM Z
--> Re: Miss Scarlet, in the Studio, with the BrushJack Fulton02/20/02-10:58:33 AM Z
--> Re: Scarlet DyeJohn Edwards02/19/02-03:52:25 PM Z
--> Re: Scarlet DyeAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/19/02-04:45:37 PM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT)John Edwards02/19/02-06:38:17 PM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT)Jack Fulton02/20/02-12:01:51 AM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT)Gordon J. Holtslander02/20/02-12:19:18 AM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT)Judy Seigel02/20/02-12:43:44 AM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT)John Edwards02/20/02-01:09:40 AM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT-II)John Edwards02/19/02-06:46:39 PM Z
--> Re: Scarlet Dye (OT-II)Bob Kiss02/19/02-07:49:05 PM Z
Would you buy it?Grafist@aol.com02/18/02-03:47:51 PM Z
RE: Would you buy it?Martin Reis02/18/02-03:55:39 PM Z
Re: Would you buy it?Kevin H. Phillips02/18/02-05:08:54 PM Z
Re: Would you buy it?Cactus Cowboy02/18/02-09:34:40 PM Z
Paper Negatives/Salt PrintsARTHURWG@aol.com02/18/02-08:46:22 AM Z
Re: Paper Negatives/Salt PrintsRichard Morris02/19/02-02:38:26 AM Z
Re: Paper Negatives/Salt PrintsJudy Seigel02/19/02-02:41:13 AM Z
Re: Paper Negatives/Salt PrintsARTHURWG@aol.com02/19/02-09:15:48 AM Z
Apologies and autochromeJean-Paul Gandolfo02/18/02-03:17:19 AM Z
Re: Apologies and autochromeDevon John02/19/02-08:13:41 PM Z
--> new balancesWilliam Marsh02/20/02-11:41:29 AM Z
Re : Silly Nonsense (OH HECK)Jean-Paul Gandolfo12/12/01-04:12:51 AM Z
Re: Re : Silly Nonsense (OH HECK)garimo02/17/02-08:05:39 PM Z
--> Re: Re : Silly Nonsense (OH HECK)Gordon J. Holtslander02/17/02-08:55:29 PM Z
--> Re: Re : Silly Nonsense (OH HECK)Bob Kiss02/17/02-09:07:10 PM Z
Re : low contrast developersJean-Paul Gandolfo12/12/01-03:38:32 AM Z
Re : Arches Platine and sizing for whatever.Jean-Paul Gandolfo12/12/01-03:35:10 AM Z
Gum or what?Grafist@aol.com02/17/02-02:39:22 PM Z
Re: Gum or what?Judy Seigel02/20/02-12:18:42 AM Z
Re: Gum or what?Grafist@aol.com02/22/02-04:01:22 PM Z
--> NiépceAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/23/02-05:45:07 AM Z
--> Re: NiépceARTHURWG@aol.com02/23/02-10:26:44 AM Z
--> Re: NiépceARTHURWG@aol.com02/23/02-10:28:05 AM Z
--> Re: NiépceAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/24/02-04:52:27 AM Z
--> Re:NiepcePeter Marshall02/23/02-01:37:21 PM Z
--> Re: NiepceAlan Mynett02/24/02-04:48:06 AM Z
--> Re: NiepcePeter Marshall02/24/02-05:17:21 AM Z
--> Re: NiépceMark02/23/02-01:46:10 PM Z
--> Re: NiépceRichard Morris02/25/02-02:59:53 AM Z
--> Re: NiépceAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/25/02-06:39:08 AM Z
"Photograph From Nature" not at Sotheby'sGumprint@aol.com02/17/02-12:53:33 AM Z
Kallitype againSandy King02/17/02-03:05:27 PM Z
--> Re: Kallitype againclay02/17/02-08:21:21 PM Z
--> Re: Kallitype againSandy King02/17/02-09:21:00 PM Z
--> RE: Kallitype againLinas Kudzma02/18/02-05:48:15 PM Z
Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityTom Ferguson02/19/02-08:03:37 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityFotoDave@aol.com02/19/02-08:27:52 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityTom Ferguson02/19/02-08:47:03 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityFotoDave@aol.com02/19/02-10:48:44 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityJudy Seigel02/20/02-12:00:34 AM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityTom Ferguson02/20/02-09:26:47 AM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityJudy Seigel02/21/02-01:33:13 AM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityJudy Seigel02/22/02-11:52:28 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityEric S. Theise02/23/02-03:52:02 AM Z
--> fractalJudy Seigel02/27/02-12:39:00 AM Z
--> Re: fractalEnder100@aol.com02/27/02-02:24:38 AM Z
--> Re: fractalJack Fulton02/27/02-09:07:36 AM Z
--> RE: fractalJohn Campbell02/27/02-09:28:24 AM Z
--> RE: fractalPeter Marshall02/27/02-05:13:21 PM Z
--> Re: fractalC Downs02/27/02-09:35:43 AM Z
--> Re: fractalPatrick Kelley02/27/02-09:41:10 AM Z
--> Re: fractalJack Fulton02/27/02-09:14:25 AM Z
--> Re: fractalJudy Seigel02/27/02-11:53:22 PM Z
--> Re: fractalTom Ferguson02/27/02-09:37:39 AM Z
--> Re: fractalFDanB@aol.com02/27/02-01:34:21 PM Z
--> Re: fractalRalph Rinke02/27/02-07:36:36 AM Z
--> Re: fractalJudy Seigel02/27/02-10:40:36 PM Z
--> RE: fractalJohn Campbell02/27/02-11:30:17 PM Z
--> Re: fractalTom Ferguson02/28/02-09:11:12 AM Z
--> Re: fractalEnder100@aol.com02/28/02-03:48:53 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityTom Ferguson02/27/02-04:07:41 PM Z
--> VDB ContrastSandy King02/23/02-05:12:51 PM Z
--> Re: VDB Contrastdina Fraioli02/23/02-06:18:16 PM Z
--> Re: VDB ContrastJudy Seigel02/23/02-10:59:46 PM Z
--> Re: VDB ContrastSandy King02/23/02-11:27:11 PM Z
--> Re: Casein Prints, Sodium Caseinate AvailabilityFotoDave@aol.com02/21/02-08:08:08 AM Z
Southeby'sGumprint@aol.com02/15/02-07:44:52 PM Z
Re: Southeby'sMarkham Johnson02/15/02-08:54:46 PM Z
Re: Southeby'sWayne D02/16/02-05:28:17 AM Z
Re: Southeby'sARTHURWG@aol.com02/16/02-08:43:18 AM Z
Calotypes/lensesARTHURWG@aol.com02/15/02-07:31:19 PM Z
Calotypes / Southeby'sARTHURWG@aol.com02/14/02-04:18:52 PM Z
Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/14/02-05:11:26 PM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sChristina Z. Anderson02/14/02-06:58:15 PM Z
Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sARTHURWG@aol.com02/14/02-07:33:38 PM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sChristina Z. Anderson02/14/02-08:58:04 PM Z
Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sARTHURWG@aol.com02/14/02-07:40:44 PM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sPeter Marshall02/15/02-04:04:21 AM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/15/02-04:44:08 AM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sPeter Marshall02/15/02-08:45:21 AM Z
--> Re: Calotypes / Southeby'sAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/15/02-01:12:44 PM Z
PHOTO-BIENNALE LUIKhenk thijs02/13/02-06:05:00 AM Z
Re: PHOTO-BIENNALE LUIKpete02/13/02-07:22:53 AM Z
A Process to Suit the SubjectGrafist@aol.com02/12/02-01:13:47 PM Z
Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectCactus Cowboy02/12/02-09:31:46 PM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectSandy King02/14/02-09:35:50 AM Z
Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectKatharine Thayer02/13/02-03:32:01 PM Z
Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectGrafist@aol.com02/14/02-07:48:30 AM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectKatharine Thayer02/14/02-02:35:05 AM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectChristine02/14/02-10:41:56 AM Z
--> RE: A Process to Suit the SubjectKeith Gerling02/14/02-11:19:22 AM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectTom Ferguson02/14/02-01:09:44 PM Z
--> RE: A Process to Suit the Subjectroger kockaerts02/15/02-02:16:59 AM Z
--> Gum without glassKatharine Thayer02/15/02-03:28:09 AM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassRobert W. Schramm02/15/02-01:43:05 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassCatherine Rogers02/15/02-08:37:59 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassBill Collins02/15/02-03:18:44 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassKatharine Thayer02/15/02-07:44:29 AM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassGreg Schmitz02/15/02-05:59:00 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassRobert W. Schramm02/17/02-12:00:08 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassRobert W. Schramm02/17/02-12:06:05 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassKatharine Thayer02/19/02-01:32:21 PM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassCarl Weese02/20/02-06:02:01 AM Z
--> Re: Gum without glassRobert W. Schramm02/20/02-07:23:37 AM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectJudy Seigel02/15/02-12:21:24 AM Z
--> basic question on mixing up cyanotype sensitizerHadi Alsegaf02/15/02-09:23:58 AM Z
--> Re: basic question on mixing up cyanotype sensitizerRobert W. Schramm02/15/02-01:28:01 PM Z
--> RE: basic question on mixing up cyanotype sensitizerMartin Reis02/15/02-01:52:18 PM Z
--> RE: basic question on mixing up cyanotype sensitizerRobert W. Schramm02/17/02-11:38:59 AM Z
--> RE: basic question on mixing up cyanotype sensitizerMartin Reis02/18/02-09:09:04 AM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectCactus Cowboy02/16/02-08:37:32 AM Z
Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectGrafist@aol.com02/15/02-03:19:27 PM Z
--> Re: A Process to Suit the SubjectJudy Seigel02/15/02-06:38:25 PM Z
Zen and the Art of Printer Malfunctions (was Epson 3000--MayDay!)John Campbell02/12/02-11:28:19 AM Z
ONE LAST LENOXJeff Buckels02/11/02-09:19:28 PM Z
Re: ONE LAST LENOXCarl Weese02/12/02-05:47:53 AM Z
Epson 3000--MayDay!John Campbell02/11/02-05:16:58 PM Z
Magic BrushSandy King02/11/02-08:29:28 PM Z
--> RE: Magic BrushLaszlo_Layton@spe.sony.com02/01/02-02:33:03 PM Z
--> RE: Magic Brushjeffbuck@swcp.com02/01/02-03:11:58 PM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushJoe Portale02/01/02-05:35:54 PM Z
--> RE: Magic BrushDon Bryant02/02/02-08:31:53 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushJoe Portale02/02/02-11:49:45 AM Z
--> RE: Magic BrushKerik Kouklis02/02/02-12:29:13 PM Z
--> RE: Magic BrushSandy King02/02/02-09:03:13 PM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushSandy King02/02/02-12:36:42 PM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-08:00:15 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushTom Ferguson02/05/02-10:21:38 AM Z
--> Can't resist a straight line; was Magic BrushBob Kiss02/02/02-07:58:42 AM Z
--> Re: Magic Brushclay02/02/02-09:03:51 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushDJRPHOTO@aol.com02/02/02-09:31:37 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushJeff Buckels02/02/02-10:52:28 AM Z
--> Re: Magic Brushclay02/02/02-10:11:20 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushPhilippe Ayral02/02/02-03:44:30 PM Z
--> RE: Magic BrushKerik Kouklis02/02/02-04:08:17 PM Z
--> Re: Magic Brushclay02/05/02-08:20:26 AM Z
--> Re: Magic BrushPhilippe Ayral02/23/02-10:44:22 AM Z
RE: Epson 3000--MayDay!Larry Roohr02/11/02-08:57:58 PM Z
Re: Epson 3000--MayDay!Bob and Carla02/11/02-10:05:48 PM Z
Re: Epson 3000--MayDay!Kemal Delic02/12/02-12:49:56 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and GumGrafist@aol.com02/11/02-03:00:07 PM Z
Re:Gum and direct carbonKatharine Thayer02/11/02-11:54:44 AM Z
Re: Oleobrom and GumFotoDave@aol.com02/12/02-07:35:45 AM Z
Re: Oleobrom and GumGrafist@aol.com02/12/02-02:45:35 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and GumFotoDave@aol.com02/13/02-07:53:45 AM Z
Re: Fwd: Re: Book by Christopher JamesSandy King02/11/02-04:58:59 PM Z
Speeding up salt prints & calotypesMartin Reis02/11/02-01:12:32 PM Z
Re: Speeding up salt prints & calotypesF. Wentzel02/12/02-02:16:35 AM Z
--> Re: Speeding up salt prints & calotypesRichard Morris02/12/02-02:42:09 AM Z
--> Re: Speeding up salt prints & calotypesJoe Portale02/12/02-11:24:48 AM Z
Wash off reliefGalina Manikova02/12/02-11:16:04 AM Z
--> Re: Wash off reliefpete02/12/02-11:58:17 AM Z
--> Re: Wash off reliefBobWicks@aol.com02/12/02-12:40:45 PM Z
--> Re: Wash off reliefpete02/12/02-01:54:28 PM Z
--> Re: Wash off reliefSandy King02/12/02-11:56:57 AM Z
RE: Speeding up salt prints & calotypesMartin Reis02/12/02-11:36:31 AM Z
RE: Speeding up salt prints & calotypesMartin Reis02/12/02-11:44:24 AM Z
multiple postings AGAINLinas Kudzma02/10/02-10:35:20 PM Z
Re: PapersLinas Kudzma02/10/02-10:17:58 PM Z
Re: PapersLinas Kudzma02/10/02-10:18:02 PM Z
Re: PapersLinas Kudzma02/22/02-10:34:33 PM Z
Re: PapersLinas Kudzma02/22/02-10:34:36 PM Z
Re: Double DippingLinas Kudzma02/10/02-10:17:53 PM Z
Re: Double DippingLinas Kudzma02/22/02-10:34:27 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and photographists and Kirk ToftGrafist@aol.com02/10/02-02:32:11 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and photographistsGrafist@aol.com02/09/02-03:13:28 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and photographistspete02/10/02-06:02:41 AM Z
--> APIS 2002 -- EnglandRichard Sullivan02/10/02-01:07:24 PM Z
--> Re: APIS 2002 -- Englandpete02/10/02-05:44:10 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and photographistsBobWicks@aol.com02/10/02-01:39:10 PM Z
Re: Oleobrom and photographistsAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/23/02-07:28:31 AM Z
--> Re: Oleobrom and photographistsJohn Cremati02/23/02-07:58:35 AM Z
--> Re: Oleobrom and photographistsAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/26/02-05:09:56 AM Z
--> Re: Oleobrom and photographistsJohn Cremati02/26/02-07:39:37 AM Z
--> Re: Oleobrom and photographistsillovich02/26/02-01:11:27 PM Z
--> Re: Oleobrom and photographistsAlejandro Lopez de Haro02/26/02-04:19:42 PM Z
OleobromGrafist@aol.com02/09/02-05:19:40 AM Z
Re: Oleobrompete02/09/02-06:49:57 AM Z
--> Re: OleobromDENNIS@klink47.freeserve.co.uk02/09/02-11:24:30 AM Z
--> Re: OleobromJudy Seigel02/10/02-01:53:08 PM Z
Re: OleobromSandy King02/09/02-09:24:02 AM Z
Re: OleobromGrafist@aol.com02/10/02-02:47:28 PM Z
--> Re: OleobromJudy Seigel02/10/02-09:52:52 PM Z
Re: OleobromGrafist@aol.com02/10/02-03:25:23 PM Z
Re: OleobromCactus Cowboy02/10/02-08:41:27 PM Z
--> beginning, rewarding gumJudy Seigel02/10/02-09:41:21 PM Z
--> Re: OleobromKatharine Thayer02/10/02-03:45:48 PM Z
Re: OleobromFotoDave@aol.com02/10/02-10:23:08 PM Z
Book by Christopher JamesSandy King02/08/02-02:57:49 PM Z
Re: Book by Christopher JamesRobert W. Schramm02/08/02-04:22:52 PM Z
Re: Book by Christopher JamesGeorge Huczek02/08/02-05:06:30 PM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesDarryl Baird02/08/02-08:57:46 PM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesGeorge Huczek02/09/02-09:26:22 AM Z
--> RE: Book by Christopher JamesDon Bryant02/08/02-11:06:53 PM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesJudy Seigel02/09/02-01:00:34 AM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesSandy King02/09/02-09:51:50 AM Z
--> What is "Good Photography"?Cactus Cowboy02/18/02-09:34:28 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?George Huczek02/19/02-08:19:46 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?illovich02/19/02-03:36:27 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Christopher Lovenguth02/19/02-08:05:14 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?R Kirk Williams02/20/02-10:09:14 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/21/02-02:01:39 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?illovich02/25/02-07:20:02 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Cactus Cowboy02/21/02-11:35:59 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Christopher Lovenguth02/22/02-10:57:07 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Liam Lawless02/22/02-12:31:23 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/22/02-11:44:05 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?clay02/23/02-08:02:39 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Grafist@aol.com02/23/02-06:11:59 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Alejandro Lopez de Haro02/23/02-06:54:04 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?jack_rosen_CFRM02/23/02-07:40:21 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/23/02-10:24:20 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/23/02-10:44:46 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Christopher Lovenguth02/24/02-11:20:50 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Christopher Lovenguth02/24/02-11:52:24 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Diana H. Bloomfield02/24/02-11:59:30 AM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Sandy King02/24/02-09:50:27 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/25/02-12:43:54 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Cactus Cowboy02/25/02-12:58:44 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/25/02-10:35:50 PM Z
--> RE: What is "Good Photography"?George Huczek02/25/02-04:28:47 PM Z
--> Formula for pre-mortem artistic success...William Marsh02/24/02-02:35:59 PM Z
--> An Opinion Please....Jonathon Russell02/24/02-09:23:46 AM Z
--> Re: An Opinion Please....Nick Makris02/25/02-09:17:41 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Grafist@aol.com02/24/02-01:06:22 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/24/02-02:17:19 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Grafist@aol.com02/24/02-06:07:34 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?pete02/24/02-08:09:30 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Grafist@aol.com02/25/02-06:36:50 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/25/02-08:23:52 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/25/02-08:28:02 AM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/25/02-10:51:22 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?illovich02/26/02-12:41:42 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/26/02-10:36:51 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?illovich02/27/02-04:06:29 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Judy Seigel02/27/02-11:28:54 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Thor Bols02/25/02-07:50:01 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Cactus Cowboy02/25/02-09:46:17 PM Z
--> Re: What is "Good Photography"?Ender100@aol.com02/25/02-11:32:04 PM Z
Re: Book by Christopher Jamesclay02/09/02-10:42:22 AM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesSandy King02/09/02-11:45:32 AM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesJudy Seigel02/10/02-11:27:51 PM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher JamesSandy King02/11/02-08:31:15 AM Z
--> Re: Book by Christopher Jamesgarimo02/11/02-05:26:06 PM Z
--> VDB formulasJudy Seigel02/15/02-05:54:08 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasSandy King02/15/02-09:46:52 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasSteve Shapiro02/15/02-10:42:58 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasJames Young02/16/02-10:48:11 AM Z
--> RE: VDB formulasLiam Lawless02/16/02-07:19:24 PM Z
--> on the contrary....Re: VDB formulasJudy Seigel02/22/02-12:18:17 AM Z
--> Re: on the contrary....Re: VDB formulasdsbryant@telocity.com02/22/02-09:59:46 AM Z
--> P-F and the POJudy Seigel02/22/02-11:29:03 PM Z
--> Re: P-F and the POSandy King02/23/02-12:09:01 AM Z
--> Photographic Facts and Formulas, 1940 ed.Judy Seigel02/25/02-01:28:18 AM Z
--> Re: P-F and the POWilliam Marsh02/23/02-01:02:14 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasclay02/17/02-02:55:00 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasGeorge L Smyth02/17/02-04:19:22 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasCarl Weese02/17/02-07:17:23 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasgarimo02/17/02-08:37:19 PM Z
--> Re: VDB formulasclay02/17/02-08:13:33 PM Z
Re: Book by Christopher Jamesclay02/09/02-02:23:39 PM Z
--> For Shannon NearyJonathan Bailey02/12/02-06:32:09 AM Z
beeswaxChristina Z. Anderson02/08/02-08:49:22 AM Z
Re: beeswaxKatharine Thayer02/08/02-10:27:20 AM Z
--> Re: beeswaxChristina Z. Anderson02/08/02-07:17:25 PM Z
Re: Kallitype vs. PT/PDRandall Webb02/08/02-04:00:02 PM Z
Re: Kallitype vs. PT/PDSandy King02/08/02-03:38:33 PM Z
Fw: UV lightsourceNick Makris02/07/02-11:59:32 AM Z
Regarding Ferric OxalateHalvor02/06/02-08:36:48 PM Z
RE: Regarding Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/07/02-07:38:19 PM Z
--> RE: Regarding Ferric OxalateHalvor02/07/02-10:41:03 PM Z
RE: Regarding Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/08/02-08:03:50 AM Z
Platine has changed...for the worseFDanB@aol.com02/06/02-02:18:31 PM Z
Re: Platine has changed...for the worseclay02/07/02-07:30:28 AM Z
Re: commercial announcementFran Engelcke02/06/02-12:08:05 AM Z
Re: commercial announcementalnovo@inwind.it02/06/02-01:57:09 AM Z
--> Re: commercial announcementJudy Seigel02/07/02-02:50:37 AM Z
Other FerricsEric Neilsen02/05/02-10:10:37 PM Z
Re: Another VanDyke questionSmieglitz@aol.com02/05/02-07:38:54 PM Z
Re: Another VanDyke questionSandy King02/05/02-08:23:08 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionJudy Seigel02/05/02-10:01:09 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionGeorge L Smyth02/06/02-05:35:31 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionJames Young02/07/02-12:11:54 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionSandy King02/07/02-09:20:52 AM Z
Ammonium Ferric Oxalatedsbryant@telocity.com02/05/02-03:46:00 PM Z
Re: Ammonium Ferric OxalateJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-04:14:28 PM Z
EDTA- Off the wall thought....John Cremati02/05/02-05:10:07 PM Z
--> RE: EDTA- Off the wall thought....ken watson02/05/02-06:53:53 PM Z
--> Re: EDTA- Off the wall thought....John Cremati02/06/02-03:57:28 AM Z
--> Re: EDTA- Off the wall thought....JohnDixon20@aol.com02/06/02-12:29:54 PM Z
--> Re: EDTA- Off the wall thought....JohnDixon20@aol.com02/06/02-12:36:11 PM Z
Magic brushWitho Worms en Jorien van Santen02/05/02-01:41:03 PM Z
Re: Magic brushTom Ferguson02/05/02-03:53:06 PM Z
Re: WHICH LENNOX? - iron in waterJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-08:17:25 AM Z
Re: Re: Anderson again twoSmieglitz@aol.com02/04/02-06:25:55 PM Z
Ferric OxalateDon Bryant02/04/02-09:48:13 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateEric Neilsen02/05/02-01:17:47 AM Z
--> RE: Ferric OxalateDon Bryant02/05/02-06:19:48 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateEric Neilsen02/05/02-10:19:16 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateSandy King02/05/02-08:51:23 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalatejeffbuck@swcp.com02/05/02-10:59:09 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-01:36:50 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateJeff Buckels02/05/02-03:00:08 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalate IIRichard Sullivan02/05/02-03:30:38 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalate IIJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-03:56:43 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalate IIRichard Sullivan02/05/02-05:32:15 PM Z
--> Help please on exposure bulbs!Christopher Lovenguth02/07/02-11:27:55 AM Z
--> Re: Help please on exposure bulbs!Eric S. Theise02/07/02-11:47:05 AM Z
--> RE: Help please on exposure bulbs!Christopher Lovenguth02/07/02-11:51:54 AM Z
--> Re: Help please on exposure bulbs!FotoDave@aol.com02/07/02-12:01:41 PM Z
--> Re: Help please on exposure bulbs!garimo02/07/02-11:56:31 AM Z
--> Re: Help please on exposure bulbs!Mark02/07/02-03:06:22 PM Z
--> RE: Help please on exposure bulbs!Christopher Lovenguth02/07/02-05:24:08 PM Z
--> Re: Help please on exposure bulbs!Nick Makris02/07/02-06:20:12 PM Z
--> TravelGalina Manikova02/10/02-05:35:03 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateRichard Sullivan02/05/02-03:20:36 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalate (NO mistake)Eric Neilsen02/05/02-10:06:40 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric Oxalate (NO mistake)Sandy King02/06/02-09:11:49 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateCarl Weese02/05/02-05:28:51 AM Z
--> RE: Ferric OxalateDon Bryant02/05/02-06:15:53 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateJeffrey D. Mathias02/05/02-07:28:43 AM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/05/02-06:06:33 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/05/02-06:16:39 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/05/02-09:32:29 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalateLinas Kudzma02/07/02-07:44:15 PM Z
--> Re: Ferric OxalatePeter Marshall02/08/02-07:55:21 AM Z
Re: traveling with filmFDanB@aol.com02/04/02-11:29:55 AM Z
RE: traveling with filmDave & Adina Ewaldz02/05/02-05:31:17 PM Z
VanDyke questionMark02/04/02-11:17:14 AM Z
Re: VanDyke questionJudy Seigel02/04/02-01:30:10 PM Z
Re: VanDyke questionPeter Marshall02/04/02-02:16:21 PM Z
Re: VanDyke questionRobert W. Schramm02/04/02-05:01:27 PM Z
Another VanDyke questionSandy King02/05/02-10:16:12 AM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionEd Buffaloe02/05/02-05:23:21 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionSandy King02/05/02-07:10:52 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionJudy Seigel02/05/02-09:46:54 PM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionclay02/06/02-08:10:38 AM Z
--> Re: Another VanDyke questionEd Buffaloe02/06/02-03:06:39 PM Z
traveling with filmTom Hawkins02/04/02-10:43:10 AM Z
Alt-photo Reminderholtsg@duke.usask.ca02/04/02-12:00:00 AM Z
Alt-photo Reminderholtsg@duke.usask.ca02/11/02-12:00:00 AM Z
Alt-photo Reminderholtsg@duke.usask.ca02/18/02-12:00:00 AM Z
Alt-photo Reminderholtsg@duke.usask.ca02/25/02-12:00:00 AM Z
alternative groundsPatrick Hilferty02/03/02-09:49:49 PM Z
Re: alternative groundsJudy Seigel02/04/02-01:17:30 AM Z
--> Re: alternative groundsBob and Carla02/04/02-10:27:35 AM Z
--> Re: alternative groundsJohn Edwards02/04/02-11:09:14 PM Z
--> Re: alternative groundsCactus Cowboy02/07/02-09:13:42 PM Z
--> Re: alternative groundsMark Kronquist02/07/02-09:45:53 PM Z
Re: alternative groundsPatrick Hilferty02/04/02-03:28:25 AM Z
--> 15 year's old, unprocessedFrank Kurzawa - Austin Texas02/04/02-08:08:14 AM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedGraeme Lyall02/01/02-11:41:38 PM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedMark Kronquist02/04/02-10:13:09 AM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedFrank Kurzawa02/04/02-10:39:07 PM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedWendy Gollihue02/05/02-07:08:50 AM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedFrank Kurzawa - Austin Texas02/05/02-08:40:38 AM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedRichard Knoppow02/04/02-02:59:24 PM Z
--> Re: 15 year's old, unprocessedFotoDave@aol.com02/04/02-11:01:49 PM Z
Lenox ReduxJeff Buckels02/03/02-04:11:52 PM Z
Re: Lenox Reduxclay02/03/02-04:35:26 PM Z
--> Re: Lenox ReduxJeff Buckels02/03/02-05:04:32 PM Z
Re: Lenox Reduxclay02/03/02-08:23:28 PM Z
I suppose...Re: gold toning van dyke brownsJudy Seigel02/01/02-02:21:36 PM Z
OK one more time with gold toning van dyke brownsChristopher Lovenguth01/29/02-01:39:48 AM Z
Re: OK one more time with gold toning van dyke brownsSandy King02/01/02-01:52:11 PM Z
Re : warning: bad word...RE: to mat or notroger.kockaerts04/05/01-07:13:07 AM Z
Re: warning: bad word...RE: to mat or notCactus Cowboy02/01/02-12:00:17 AM Z
--> Re: warning: bad word...RE: to mat or notroger kockaerts02/01/02-02:10:04 AM Z
Re: Arches Platineclay01/31/02-11:00:17 PM Z
Re: Arches PlatineWendy Gollihue02/01/02-07:09:04 PM Z
Re: Arches PlatineKatharine Thayer02/02/02-01:02:54 AM Z
Re: Arches Platineclay02/02/02-09:22:20 AM Z
--> Re: Arches PlatineJeff Buckels02/02/02-10:48:11 AM Z
--> Re: Arches Platine specklesKatharine Thayer02/03/02-05:26:22 AM Z
Re: Arches Platineclay02/02/02-09:37:55 PM Z
--> Re: Arches PlatineWitho Worms en Jorien van Santen02/03/02-03:04:08 AM Z
"The Art of Encaustic Painting"Judy Seigel01/31/02-11:14:47 PM Z
Re : CONCENTRATIONSroger.kockaerts04/19/01-07:12:14 AM Z
Re : CONCENTRATIONSroger.kockaerts04/19/01-08:28:01 AM Z
--> Re:Re : CONCENTRATIONSalnovo@inwind.it02/01/02-07:00:45 AM Z
Virus noticeNick Makris02/01/02-08:03:42 AM Z
Re: Virus noticeJoe Portale02/01/02-05:32:28 PM Z
Re: Carbon PrintingBobWicks@aol.com02/01/02-07:19:14 AM Z
Re: Carbon PrintingSandy King02/01/02-01:06:15 PM Z
--> Re: Carbon PrintingJudy Seigel02/01/02-02:18:21 PM Z
--> Re: Carbon PrintingSandy King02/01/02-04:46:08 PM Z
RE: Carbon PrintingKeith Gerling02/01/02-03:17:37 PM Z
Scopick on Scopickpete02/01/02-08:50:07 AM Z
Anderson again twopete02/01/02-08:50:07 AM Z
Re: Anderson again twoJudy Seigel02/01/02-02:01:33 PM Z
--> Re: Anderson again twopete02/02/02-04:11:04 AM Z
--> Re: Anderson again twoCactus Cowboy02/04/02-08:41:13 AM Z
--> RE: Anderson again twoKeith Gerling02/04/02-10:12:00 AM Z
--> HISTORY Re: Anderson again twoJudy Seigel02/05/02-10:30:25 PM Z
--> Re: HISTORY Re: Anderson again twopete02/06/02-06:07:10 AM Z
--> a funny thing/ Re: Anderson again twoJudy Seigel02/08/02-03:54:01 AM Z
--> Re: a funny thing/ Re: Anderson again twoCactus Cowboy02/08/02-11:49:52 PM Z
--> Re: a funny thing/ Re: Anderson again twoJudy Seigel02/09/02-01:42:48 AM Z
--> Re: a funny thing/ Re: Anderson again twopete02/09/02-01:50:49 AM Z
--> Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)Katharine Thayer02/10/02-05:19:20 PM Z
--> Re: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)BobWicks@aol.com02/11/02-07:27:21 AM Z
--> Re: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)Katharine Thayer02/11/02-02:15:39 AM Z
--> Re: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)Cactus Cowboy02/11/02-11:33:43 PM Z
--> Re: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)Judy Seigel02/12/02-10:38:09 PM Z
--> RE: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)John Campbell02/12/02-10:42:11 PM Z
--> That Varn Gum /RE: Dichromates and staining (was: a funny thing....)Judy Seigel02/13/02-09:26:14 PM Z
--> Pigment Flaking and Staining in GumKeith Gerling02/14/02-08:45:22 AM Z
--> Re: Pigment Flaking and Staining in GumKatharine Thayer02/14/02-02:09:32 AM Z
--> RE: Pigment Flaking and Staining in GumKeith Gerling02/14/02-10:59:10 AM Z
--> Re: Pigment Flaking and Staining in GumKatharine Thayer02/14/02-03:21:37 AM Z
--> RE: Pigment Flaking and Staining in GumKeith Gerling02/14/02-12:02:04 PM Z
--> 3 little tests Re: Anderson again twoJudy Seigel02/08/02-04:19:15 AM Z
Anderson again onepete02/01/02-08:47:20 AM Z
RE: Arches PlatineLiam Lawless01/31/02-08:07:33 PM Z
RE: Arches PlatineLiam Lawless01/31/02-09:21:50 PM Z

Last message date: 03/01/02-04:54:40 PM Z Archived on: 03/08/02-09:45:22 AM Z CST
Date view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/08/02-09:45:22 AM Z CST