Was: Duplicating film, a Ps..

Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Breukel, C (HKG) (cor@lumc.nl)
Date: 02/28/02-05:45:19 AM Z


..below statement in my previous Email doesn't make sense I realise..

Since this is duplicating film, increasing enlarger exposure will mean
less density on the resulting film. So the unexposed parts of the film
should get to a Dmax, only depending on the developer (time and
dilution), and LC-1 2:3:5 is simply to weak to obtain a usefull Dmax..

Cor

"Breukel, C (HKG)" wrote:

>
> ..yes I tried, but as you obviuosly know, this developer is much
> "slower"... An exposure of 90 sec at f5.6 (150mm lens, condensor
> enlager, 150 w bulb) gave a barely visible image after 7 min developing
> in LC-1 2:3:5, so I gave up on this dilution..
>
> Cor


Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 03/08/02-09:45:22 AM Z CST