From: Linas Kudzma (lkudzma@earthlink.net)
Date: 01/01/02-06:57:30 PM Z
Sandy,
Yes, it is quite interesting that I get good results despite a ten-fold
lower amount of metol due to the typo where metol is mentioned in
unblinkingeye.com. I have several negatives that I consider among my best
of 2001 that I developed using the low metol pyrocat.
Linas
> [Original Message]
> From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
> To: <lkudzma@earthlink.net>
> Date: 1/1/2002 5:15:41 PM
> Subject: Re: Pyrocat HD - metol vs phenidone
>
> Linas,
>
> I don't remember if the article in Post Factory mentioned metol.
> However, if the formula at Unblinkingeye gives 0.25g of metol per
> 100ml of stock it is in error from my original Pyrocat formula which
> used 2.5g of metol per 100ml of stock A.
>
> I find it very interesting that your Pyrocat is working so well with
> this small amount of metol. You must be correct in that the metol is
> being regenerated in an superadditive way.
>
> Regards
>
> Sandy
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/15/02-11:47:41 AM Z CST