Re: Paper again.

From: clay (wcharmon@wt.net)
Date: 01/29/02-07:04:51 PM Z

• Next message: Nick Makris: "Re: Ink Jet Transparencies as Negs"
• Previous message: clay: "Re: Paper again."
• Maybe in reply to: Wendy Gollihue: "Paper again."
• Next in thread: Wendy Gollihue: "Re: Paper again."
• Reply: Wendy Gollihue: "Re: Paper again."

Wendy:

I can vouch for staying away from the 2 ply. I watched in horror as several
prints delaminated in the clearing baths. But it makes great stock for
school poster projects.

Clay
----------
>From: Kerik Kouklis <kerik@kerik.com>
>To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Paper again.
>Date: Tue, Jan 29, 2002, 6:56 PM
>

>Oh, and another point. One thing to watch out for with the 2-ply drawing
>papers (Rising and Strathmore): the plys can separate causing bubbles in
>the print. The one-ply papers print just as well for me and have plenty
>of strength to hold up when wet. As for surface, I find that Rising
>plate and vellum are almost indistinguishable. Strathmore plate was a
>disaster to print on for me, but the vellum surface is gorgeous.
>
>Best,
>Kerik
>www.Kerik.com
>

• Next message: Nick Makris: "Re: Ink Jet Transparencies as Negs"
• Previous message: clay: "Re: Paper again."
• Maybe in reply to: Wendy Gollihue: "Paper again."
• Next in thread: Wendy Gollihue: "Re: Paper again."
• Reply: Wendy Gollihue: "Re: Paper again."

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : 02/15/02-11:47:41 AM Z CST