From: Larry Roohr (lrryr@attbi.com)
Date: 07/03/02-07:36:09 AM Z
One other advantage to digital inkjet neg's may be (haven't tried this yet)
that you could make a careful horizontal and vertical measurement of your
paper, perhaps on well placed registration marks, resize the negative and
print one out in a matter of minutes, make your exposure and go. Sounds too
easy, doesn't it.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: Cactus Cowboy [mailto:cactus@tritel.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 7:18 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum over Kallitype with Pyro negative
Cor wrote:
(snip)
> But in my previous gum over kallitype I did the seizing with gelatine
> and the hardening with Glyxoal as a seperate steps, and still had no
> perfect register for a 18*24 cm negative, both on Canson Fonteney and
> Arches Aquarelle.. (..random thought: perhaps the registration is harder
> when printing 2 different processes on top of each other?..)
Greetings from Big Wonderful Wyoming,
I've made many multiple coating gum and gum/cyanotype prints.
Re-registration is always an issue. Due to fluctuations in humidity,
perfect re-registration is nearly impossible, without manipulating the
paper. If, after applying the next coat of emulsion, the paper is too
'large' in relation to the negative, I'll gently apply heat on the backside
of the paper with a hair dryer. This shrinks the paper slightly, bringing
it into register with the negative. If the paper has shrunk too much, I
barely moisten the backside with a damp sponge. This makes the paper
expand, again bringing it back into register.
I also use steel register pins to hold the punched negative and paper
together. It's a fast, easy, and very accurate method.
My experience with gum and cyanotype has shown that combining processes does
not make re-registration any more difficult.
Best regards,
Dave Rose
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 09/19/02-11:11:00 AM Z CST