FotoDave@aol.com
Date: 07/14/02-09:10:15 PM Z
> Would i be correct, that a mere lightmeter reading would not be
> sufficent. IE If the light exposing the contact frame is EV 22. And my
> Enlarger is projecting EV 2, that still would not account for the actual
> UV transmission?
Yes, that is correct because you don't know how much UV was filtered by the
lens.
> The second choice would be artificial light, but I know that area is
> expensive. Getting an old plate burner.
How about using enlarged negatives?
Dave S
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 09/19/02-11:11:00 AM Z CST