Re: PRINTING FRAMES

From: Sandy King (sanking@clemson.edu)
Date: 10/09/02-08:08:43 AM Z

• Next message: Christopher Lovenguth: "Re: Sealing a Daguerreotype...is it possible?"
• Previous message: Sandy King: "RE: PRINTING FRAMES"
• In reply to: Jeffrey D. Mathias: "Re: PRINTING FRAMES"
• Next in thread: Eric Neilsen: "RE: PRINTING FRAMES"

I agree with Jeffrey. You need to be more concerned that the glass is
thick enough to avoid flexing, and in a real worst case scenario,
breaking. For a 20X24" frame I would recommend 1/4" glass.

Sandy King

>Temi wrote:
>> ... Does anyone have any
>> experience as to how the thickness of the glass might affect the
>> exposure.
>
>The exposure due to thickness is not what to be concerned about; it will
>be little. The glass should be thick enough not to flex causing
>incomplete or non-uniform contact. This becomes more critical with
>larger frames.
>
>--
>Jeffrey D. Mathias
>http://home.att.net/~jeffrey.d.mathias/

-- 

• Next message: Christopher Lovenguth: "Re: Sealing a Daguerreotype...is it possible?"
• Previous message: Sandy King: "RE: PRINTING FRAMES"
• In reply to: Jeffrey D. Mathias: "Re: PRINTING FRAMES"
• Next in thread: Eric Neilsen: "RE: PRINTING FRAMES"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 11/14/02-02:40:26 PM Z CST