Ender100@aol.com
Date: 09/20/02-12:43:23 PM Z
well, the judge didn't skirt the issue... maybe he considered the breeze an
"act of God". hehehehe
Actually we had a case here in Elgin, IL where a guy went up to a woman and
asked to take her picture... she was sort of flustered by the whole thing and
while she was frozen in a state of fluster, the guy shoved the camera under
her skirt and snapped away. He was arrested. Some friends saw the article
in the local newspaper and called me and asked me when I had gotten out of
jail. I guess they don't know many photographers.
This reminds me of when my daughter went to camp. The guys would grab the
girls' cameras and shove them down their own swim suits/shorts snap a shot
and hand them back. I wonder what the parents thought when they got the
prints back? Underdeveloped?
Mark Nelson
In a message dated 9/20/02 2:34:45 PM, finger0101@hotmail.com writes:
<< Yes, and I also find it very ironic that a Federal Judge in Washington
State
ruled that it is perfectly legal
to video tape and photograph up women's skirts in public places without
their consent. Heaven forbid someone takes a picture of a building demmed
"sensitive." >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/02-03:47:09 PM Z CST