Re: unprintable

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: david distefano (zfd@lightspeed.net)
Date: 04/07/03-02:08:48 PM Z


the unprintable is now very printable. thanks for all the suggestions. i believe it
was bad pot. ox.

thanks agin
david

david distefano wrote:

> to be on the safe side, i have ordered new ferric ox. and pot. ox. i also bought
> new trays. some one made a comment about new ferric ox. and old palladium. i was
> under the impression that platinum and palladium had no shelf life problem. am i
> wrong in this assumption. if so i will also purchase new plat. and palladium.
> also i had started mixing cessium palladim with standard palladium and platinum.
> could this have been a cause of my problems. i had never done this in the past.
> i do use super actinic bulbs. they are about 2 years old everything else is the
> same.
>
> david
>
> Carl Weese wrote:
>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > do you have any old stuff around to compare to? Just because a chemical is
> > new doesn't mean it can't be contaminated or otherwise bad. As Kerik already
> > asked, what about your paper? Do you notice a lot of "bleeding" from dark
> > areas during develpment? That can indicate bad pot.ox.
> >
> > ---Carl


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 05/01/03-11:59:54 AM Z CST