From: Nick Makris (nick@mcn.org)
Date: 08/05/03-12:41:43 PM Z
Philippe and all,
Scanning a digital image is not recommended for the purpose of the
comparison you are trying to make (IMO). While the scanning part is not a
problem, my experience is that at any given scanning resolution the digital
artifacts in the original digital (I'm not sure we can call a digital image
an original) artwork begin to show in the resulting copy/scan. The net
effect is that you can not be sure of what you are looking at and any
comparison of that result would show it to be highly inferior to a scan of a
continuous tone fim image.
My 2¢, FWIW.
n
----- Original Message -----
From: "Monnoyer Philippe" <monnoyer@imec.be>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 8:00 AM
Subject: inkjet negs palladium prints
> Hello,
>
> I have two questions:
>
> #1
> I wonder if it's possible to achieve enough optical density in the UV to
print on pure palladium (enough means here 3.2).
>
> #2
> I wonder if an inkjet neg print offers an equivalent quality as with
silver halide negs. I think not, but if yes, would anyone have a scan of
details that would help me make an opinion ?
>
> I you have scans, please e-mail me offline.
>
> Thanks you very much for your help,
>
> Philippe
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 09/05/03-09:30:45 AM Z CST