Re: Where there's a will (was: Re: spots and fish eyes)

From: Christina Z. Anderson ^lt;zphoto@montana.net>
Date: 12/09/03-12:24:42 PM Z
Message-id: <003b01c3be82$02123740$ce08980c@your6bvpxyztoq>

As hot as my faucet will deliver--not too hot to burn, just too hot to take
a bath in. How scientific...
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Katharine Thayer" <kthayer@pacifier.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: Where there's a will (was: Re: spots and fish eyes)

> Katharine Thayer wrote:
> >
> > http://www.pacifier.com/~kthayer/html/Current.html
> >
> > Important Note:
> > Here's Chris's image, but this is not the file Chris sent me. This is
> > the file Chris sent me, printed out on an old inkjet printer and
> > re-scanned; it was the only way I could figure out how to do it. So it's
> > much more pixelated than the original file, and the colors are off, so
> > it's not a good representation of the image at all, and I apologize to
> > Chris for that. But it does show the lines and splotches, which is what
> > this was about. Sorry for the delay,
> > kt
>
>
> Addendum:
> I couldn't figure out why the color was so way off, (very magenta,
> beyond restoring adequately in Photoshop to anything close to its
> original color balance) and finally it occurred to me (duh) to run a
> nozzle check and sure enough I wasn't getting any yellow ink and not all
> the cyan I should have. I cleaned the nozzles, reprinted, rescanned and
> reposted, and while it's still a scan of an inkjet of a jpeg of a scan
> of a (etc etc etc) it does represent the colors of the original file
> better now than the version that the post above refers to. I can't tell
> how close because I can't look at them both at the same time.
>
> But I'm curious, Chris --- how hot was the water you used for the shrink
> step?
> kt
>
Received on Tue Dec 9 12:27:20 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/02/04-09:36:33 AM Z CST