Re: More digital negatives

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: Nick Makris (nick@mcn.org)
Date: 02/12/03-07:50:25 AM Z


Judy, I still have my 1160 with MIS quad inks and 1520 with stock Epson
ink. Neither is suitable for the digital negs I want to produce, the former
because the ink won't dry and the latter because it's color and as I said, I
could live with any density issues. So to answer your question, I'm not
making any digital negs of late because the search for the Holy Grail
continues.

I will however look forward to any news you have in this area.

N

----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: More digital negatives

>
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Nick Makris wrote:
>
> > image is very delicate, and 2) there is not enough density in the
>
>
> Nick, I've just finished testing a bunch of substrates that if I can
> rescue my corrupted file and get the scattered pieces together is supposed
> to be shared with the world... I found that for my purposes neither of
> these problems obtains... So I wonder... what ink and what substrate are
> you using... And What density do you need?
>
> J.
>
>
>


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 03/04/03-09:19:08 AM Z CST