From: Carl Weese (cweese@earthlink.net)
Date: 01/14/03-02:22:19 PM Z
Judy,
It's partly the bristles, and partly the shaping of the business end which
has a pronounced chisel shape on the Richeson. The Da Vinci works too, and
is economical with sensitizer, but the Richeson is easier to control.---Carl
--
web site with picture galleries
and workshop information at:
http://home.earthlink.net/~cweese/
----------
>From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: "magic brush"
>Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2003, 3:04 PM
>
>
> The brush Witho uses is da Vinci, sold at NY Central for $24 for two inch
> (5 cm) size. My understanding is that the "magic" is a synthetic
> filament, not a particular brush, and he finds this one just as good. The
> idea is that the synthetic filament doesn't abosrb emulsion.
>
> The da vinci BTW is made in Germany. Maybe costs less there.
>
> J.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST