Re: "magic brush"

About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

From: kerik (kerik@kerik.com)
Date: 01/14/03-02:44:12 PM Z


I have both the Richeson 9010 and the da Vinci. They are similar, but not the same.
The daVinci is thicker and tends to hang on to more sensitizer. They both work well,
but the advantage goes to the Richeson. And cost is similar.

Kerik

>The brush Witho uses is da Vinci, sold at NY Central for $24 for two inch
>(5 cm) size. My understanding is that the "magic" is a synthetic
>filament, not a particular brush, and he finds this one just as good. The
>idea is that the synthetic filament doesn't abosrb emulsion.
>
>The da vinci BTW is made in Germany. Maybe costs less there.
>
>J.


About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST