Re: Argyrotypes!

From: Carl Weese (cweese@earthlink.net)
Date: 01/14/03-02:25:42 PM Z

• Next message: Judy Seigel: "light question (semi off topic)"
• Previous message: Judy Seigel: "Re: A Joyful View"
• Maybe in reply to: epona: "Argyrotypes!"
• Next in thread: Sandy King: "The Richeson brush, was Re: Argyrotypes!"
• Reply: Sandy King: "The Richeson brush, was Re: Argyrotypes!"

Christine,

I know some people love the 4" brush but I'm perfectly happy with a 2" for
prints from 8x10 to 12x20. For 'miniature negatives'--4x5 & 5x7--I use a 1".

---Carl

--
        web site with picture galleries
        and workshop information at:
        http://home.earthlink.net/~cweese/
----------
>From: epona <acolyta@napc.com>
>To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Argyrotypes!
>Date: Tue, Jan 14, 2003, 3:28 PM
>
> Yikes, that's pricey!  Do you use the largest size?
>
> Thanks,
> Christine
> 

• Next message: Judy Seigel: "light question (semi off topic)"
• Previous message: Judy Seigel: "Re: A Joyful View"
• Maybe in reply to: epona: "Argyrotypes!"
• Next in thread: Sandy King: "The Richeson brush, was Re: Argyrotypes!"
• Reply: Sandy King: "The Richeson brush, was Re: Argyrotypes!"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST