From: Jack Fulton (jefulton1@attbi.com)
Date: 01/15/03-06:53:50 AM Z
You may be right in the nomenclature Judy. I'm trying to find what the heck
it's called.
The reason for mentioning glass is that wood can become saturated
w/chemistry as its porous. Glass or plastic may be washed.
My experience with this sort of brush gave a more consistent coating than
foam. The foam brush is still in used in my darkroom but I'm always washing
and washing it. With the barlow/buckle brush only a small piece of the pile
is used. And, yes, old nightgowns or flannel pajamas can be employed but the
short synthetic pile is large step above the flannel fabric. Too, it was the
type of applicator used prior to the foam brush. which is a great
invention/innovation.
Jack
>> Good old sweet, slightly mad, Carlos Gasparinho used a nifty brush that is
>> disposable. I forget it's technical name . . something like a 'barlow'
>> brush.
>> It was a flat, rectangular (about 2" x 8") piece of glass, sanded on all
>> edges.
>> Go to a good fabric store and purchase synthetic pile. It is a fabric that
>> has millions of fibrous hairs . . sort of like a close-up of a lawn. You cut
>> the fabric into strips . . say 2" x 3" and place it at one end of the glass
>
>
> If memory serves that was called a buckle brush, didn't have to be glass,
> a flat shim of wood would serve, and the ones I made (from instructions in
> old process books) used strips of flannel from worn out nightgown... I
> think it was what they used before they had foam. I ultimately abandoned
> it in favor of the nice soft foam brush (one with the wood handle) for a
> number of reasons including that if there were the least irregularity in
> the underlayment, it left a mark when coating with something rigid.
>
> The foam takes that in stride.
>
> J.
>
>
>> wrapping it tightly with good rubber band.
>> The coating with this is superb: smooth and very even and simple. It seems
>> to better than my push rods.
>> The good thing is that each time you coat, you replace the cloth, hence
>> each coating can never be contaminated. It is extremely inexpensive.
>> Jack
>>
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 02/21/03-10:44:16 AM Z CST