Re: Photogravure question

From: zamm@optonline.net
Date: 11/03/03-09:41:40 AM Z
Message-id: <10ca9c107c90.107c9010ca9c@optonline.net>

----- Original Message -----
From: Jalo Porkkala <jalo.porkkala@luukku.com>
Date: Monday, November 3, 2003 2:52 am
Subject: Re: Photogravure question

> Hello List,
>
> for all those thinking polymer gravure is not "real" photogravure
> a couple of web sites to visit. Polymer gravure has been
> practitioned in Scandinavia well over 10 years now, and the
> results can be stunning ...
>
> http://www.psy.ku.dk/ross/
> http://www2.uiah.fi/~teofilus/
> http://www.photoeye.com/templates/ShowDetailsbyCat.cfm?Catalog=ZB305
>
> Jalo

Yes, Jalo, they are stunning.
Beautiful representations of photo-polymer engraving. We are discussing the fact that they are not photogravures, not how beautiful they are.
 Look at it this way: you have two works of art. One is a lithograph and one is an etching. They are both beautiful, fantastic examples of technical excellence, the top of thier respective processes. That does not change the fact that one is a lithograph and one is an etching.
A photogravure is a photogravure.
A polymer engraving ( or polymer gravure if you will) is a polymer engraving.
Simple, no judgements, just different processes.
Cheers, Craig Z.
Received on Mon Nov 3 09:42:21 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:02 PM Z CST