I totally agree with Jeff.
Looks great and really a fine case for digital neg
printing.
Cheers
Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Sumner [mailto:jdos2@mindspring.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 19:50
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Please comment
If you aren't "there," you are too bloody close to call.
It's beautiful.
On Nov 6, 2003, at 7:23 PM, Loris Medici wrote:
> Cyanotypefrom digital negative.
>
> This is one of my best cyanotypes ever (from a digital negative, I
> have 2 more but they're in an exhibition). I did my best to make the
> scan look like the print.
>
> See the original (I mean the file for the negative)here.
>
> What do you think? Am I close? I would like to hear your suggestions.
> (I've overexposed intentionally, plan to tone the print. Do you think
> the amount of the overexposure is OK?)
>
> Best regards,
> Loris.
--- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 11/06/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.537 / Virus Database: 332 - Release Date: 11/06/2003Received on Fri Nov 7 10:00:18 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:02 PM Z CST