2nd thought on gloy

From: Judy Seigel ^lt;jseigel@panix.com>
Date: 11/18/03-12:09:44 AM Z
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0311180056410.18276@panix1.panix.com>

On Mon, 17 Nov 2003, Keith Gerling wrote:

 Keith, something came to mind about the gloy -- You said you got LONGER
scale with it, and I couldn't get contone at all. Weren't you using
digital negatives? If so, that could explain it... At least I've found
that a dot negative (imagesetter, inkjet or other) is much easier to print
in gum, because the dot is either on or off, no need to hold partly
exposed delicate highlights that want to float away.

You say you got a longer scale with gloy... On a step tablet? what kind?

J.
Received on Tue Nov 18 00:09:48 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/04/03-05:18:03 PM Z CST