From: shannon stoney (sstoney@pdq.net)
Date: 10/16/03-05:04:24 PM Z
sandy wrote:
>As far as I am concerned the Epson 2200 is the best printer for
>making digital negatives. I saw the note from Perry about not being
>able to build up enough density with the 2200 to get good highlights
>but I have to assume his problem is media, not the printer. The 2200
>is widely used with Pictorico and with this media is capable of
>making excellent negatives with a high enough density range for
>palladium printing. I have to assume either that Perry used some
>other media that won't hold the pigmented ink of the Epson 2200 as
>well as Pictorico, or if not, something is wrong with his printer.
>
So, do you make spectral density negatives or black and white digital
negatives on your 2200? (Our printer just broke and I am thinking of
buying one.)
--shannon
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 11/05/03-09:22:18 AM Z CST