From: Loris Medici (lorism@tnn.net)
Date: 09/09/03-02:44:46 AM Z
Dear Peter,
I was mentioning "the curve for the enlarged negative" - I have no
problems in printing positive images on paper using quadtone inks
(thanks to Jeff Randall - the maker of RGB partitioned workflow for MIS
FS inks. As the MIS FS inkset and Cone inkset dilutions match, the
workflow works perfectly for Cone inks too - I'm waiting for the new
profiles with great enthusiasm BTW).
What curve did you use to make the negative? Or did you just reversed
the image and printed to the transparency?
Again, what can people say on making enlarged negatives on Pictorico OHP
using any of the quadtone pigment inksets (especially Piezotones)? Is
there any enlarged negative maker using the combination mentioned in the
subject line?
Regards,
Loris.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Marshall [mailto:petermarshall@cix.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 11:02 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Pictorico OHP + Selenium Piezotone inks +
> Randall partitioned
>
>
> Loris,
>
> I have made one negative - for another photographer using the
> plugin. No
> crazy banding. However, as I said, the plugin is almost
> history now, and
> Cone are going over to using icc profiles, available shortly.
>
> You do get a different dither pattern with the plugin, in
> some respects
> better than the Epson one - slightly sharper, but with a
> weave-like effect
> when looked at with a loupe. The plugin does requires a
> better adjusted
> printer than the Epson driver, so you may be unlucky in that
> respect. If
> you hang on a few weeks, I think the new icc profiles will be
> available,
> giving really easy results in Photoshop - no curve adjustments needed.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Marshall
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : 10/01/03-03:09:00 PM Z CST