Hi Christina,
Interesting! But would you have been as prolific if you knew you were going to
incur the cost of buying more film and developing it? Also do you think you
were more carefree (or even sloppy) when taking photos since you knew you could
always delete it if it didn't turn out? Did the ability to take more photos
make you a better photographer or just more prolific?
I don't have an answer to any of these questions myself. Just wondering your
opinion and that of any others who have made the transition to digital.
Jon
Christina Z. Anderson wrote:
> Good morning, all,
> As usual I sit here avoiding writing outlines and papers...I decided
> instead to clean and organize all my digital images I have taken since July
> when I bought my first digital camera.
> I decided to add up how many images I have taken and compute how much
> money I have saved in film and developing costs. Mind you, this is just
> acounting for the ones I have *saved*, and therefore does not include the
> myriad images I have deleted. In 9 months I have paid for my camera twice
> over, in savings. That is an incredibly conservative estimate. My advice
> as far as buying or not buying a digital camera? "Just do it".
> Chris
>
>
>
Received on Tue Apr 13 13:28:17 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/14/04-02:14:31 PM Z CST