RE: Print Quality

From: Robert J. Triffin ^lt;rjtriffin@rcn.com>
Date: 04/18/04-06:52:43 AM Z
Message-id: <000501c42544$0a56c8c0$0402a8c0@Debra>

Please note my new e-mail address: flavius@rcn.com

Thank you

*********************

-----Original Message-----
From: Baird, Darryl [mailto:dbaird@umflint.edu]
Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2004 8:14 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
Subject: RE: Print Quality

Mark,

Might I humbly ask (my wife would say no, I'm never humble, but she
doesn't know as much about digital printing ;-}) which papers you are
refering to with this statement. I spent the better part of yesterday
working on finding a new paper for the new Epson 4000 (the school
bought we one instead of giving me a raise).

Larry Danque of Cone Editions told me they still thought Hannemuhle
Photo Rag was still the best coated matter paper.

thanks

Darryl

-----Original Message-----
From: Ender100@aol.com [mailto:Ender100@aol.com]
Sent: Sun 4/18/2004 3:06 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: Re: Print Quality
 
=snip=

there are a few papers with coatings that can hold the dot gain with
the higher printer resolutions.
Received on Sun Apr 18 06:56:39 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 05/14/04-02:14:32 PM Z CST