Well according to the version of the article Sam wrote for "Coming Into
Focus" he uses a Nuarc N750 Mercury UV source.
*****
Life is nothing but a competition to be
the criminal rather than the victim.
-Bertrand Russell
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 4:15 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
> Subject: Sam Wang light?
>
>
> This discussion is making me remember the discussion about speed and
> dichromate concentration in gum, in which Sandy argued that Sam's
> printing times must be about the same for diluted dichromate as they
> would be for saturated dichromate, even though to date there has been no
> comparison data offered whatever to show that this is true. This seems
> oddly contrary to the position he is taking here with regard to data,
> but never mind that for the moment. Since actual data don't seem to be
> forthcoming on the earlier question, I'd like to know at least this:
>
> Sam, what do you use for your light source for gum? I don't see it on
> your article on unblinkingeye, although I could have missed it because
> the dang site keeps sending me to amazon.com while I'm trying to read an
> article, so I have to keep going back and trying to find my place where
> I was before I got dumped to amazon. Why does it do that, Ed? It's
> annoying as heck.
> Katharine Thayer
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/03
>
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.544 / Virus Database: 338 - Release Date: 11/25/03Received on Wed Jan 14 19:34:57 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/02/04-09:49:59 AM Z CST