Mail System Error - Returned Mail

This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

Each of the following recipients was rejected by a remote mail server.
The reasons given by the server are included to help you determine why
each recipient was rejected.

    Recipient: <pepekubrick@terra.es>
    Reason: 5.7.1 <pepekubrick@terra.es>... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed [10.20.4.38]

Please reply to <postmaster@teleline.es>
if you feel this message to be in error.

Return-path: <alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca>
Received: from skyway.usask.ca ([128.233.192.232])
 by tsmtp18.mail.isp (terra.es) with ESMTP id HRS6Y300.Y0J for
 <pepekubrick@terra.es>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:13:15 +0100
Received: from PROCESS-DAEMON.sask.usask.ca by sask.usask.ca
 (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30663) id <01L5LUXFMZLS8XFECM@sask.usask.ca>
 (original mail from jseigel@panix.com) for pepekubrick@terra.es; Tue,
 20 Jan 2004 03:13:07 -0600 (CST)
Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.sask.usask.ca by sask.usask.ca
 (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30663) id <01L5LUXFKDF48XEUWV@sask.usask.ca> for
 alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
 (ORCPT alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca); Tue,
 20 Jan 2004 03:12:57 -0600 (CST)
Received: from spamf1.usask.ca ([128.233.150.97])
 by sask.usask.ca (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30663)
 with ESMTP id <01L5LUXFGPK48XGYUF@sask.usask.ca> for
 alt-photo-process-l-expand@process.sask.usask.ca
 (ORCPT alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca); Tue,
 20 Jan 2004 03:12:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74])
        by spamf1.usask.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0K9Ctfr003093 for
 <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>; Tue,
 20 Jan 2004 03:12:56 -0600 (envelope-from jseigel@panix.com)
Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3])
        by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB6C982EA for
 <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:12:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]])
        by panix3.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) with ESMTP id i0K9Csd03380
        for <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:12:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 04:12:54 -0500 (EST)
From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
Subject: RE: Arches Platine
In-reply-to: <59E2A8496CF4ED4C87E90AC53EE33A2C01FF099D@e2k03.imec.be>
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Message-id: <Pine.NEB.4.58.0401200409450.2690@panix3.panix.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-PMX-Version: 4.1.1.86173
X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='REFERENCES 0.000,
 IN_REP_TO 0'
References: <59E2A8496CF4ED4C87E90AC53EE33A2C01FF099D@e2k03.imec.be>
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
List-Id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>

Philippe,

You mentioned "a new batch." If memory serves that's the paper is very
different when made in summer or winter, and one of them doesn't work for
pt/pd. I think it was David Aldera at NY Central artists materials, said
a couple of his customers, when a new batch comes in, take a couple of
sheets to try, before filling in with their usual order.

Judy